Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
201 user(s) are online (112 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 200

moodydavid16, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal

Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (Owen_Dyneto)




Re: ZIS-115
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
I've not heard that the Father Divine Duesenberg survived, but I suppose it could be hidden away in some garage in Philadelphia, Duesenbergs have a VERY high survival rate. Brings to mind Mr. Leno's recent "find" of a Duesenberg which some of you may have read about recently.

Attach file:



jpg  (225.92 KB)
177_4908c17822be4.jpg 1280X1041 px

Posted on: 2008/10/29 15:03
 Top 


Re: Was 1947 the last year for the Packard Six?
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
Thanks, how do you do that? (that is, add the link to a thread into your response).

Posted on: 2008/10/29 14:55
 Top 


Re: Was 1947 the last year for the Packard Six?
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
There was a recent, long, long thread on the topic of the Packard sixes which has all the information (and perhaps more than you want) on this, including the 6 cylinder export cars, taxis, use of the 245 six in Packard marine engines, the White COE truck, etc. Suggest you browse around to find it or perhaps someone will post a link to it, it's titled "last 6 cylinder".

Posted on: 2008/10/29 13:51
 Top 


Re: IMHO, the 1950s Packard designs have held up well...
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
I likewise have always liked the Reinhart 51-56 body shell and thought it quite competitive for a conservative style. Kevin makes a great point about how well the same concept succeeds on the Chrysler 300. I thought the 51/52 models a bit plain and frumpy, even the Patricians were frugal compared to the 23rd series Custom 8 and it was a major error that the convertibles and hardtops weren't a senior car, but by 1953 and 54 I thought the whole line was very attractive and nicely trimmed. One of my largest suprises years back was when I realized the 55/56 cars were reworks of the basic 51 shell, it was nothing short of an amazing transformation; though those cars were glitzy, colorful and chrome-laden, that's what the public wanted - just look at a 56 Hudson or DeSoto/Chrysler for comparison.

I like some of the bathtubs (owned 2), especially the Custom 8s and especially the victorias of that model, but overall the 22nd/23rd series were, while perhaps competitive with Nash and a few other bulbous designs, good sellers in the market but the passage of time hasn't treated them as well as it might have. Tough luck for Packard that WW II took away the excitement and momentum of the original Clipper design. Hindsight is always advantaged of course, but I would rather have seen the 42-47 Clipper style soldier on another year another or two, with a convertible added, and skipped the bathtub era altogether.

Posted on: 2008/10/29 12:44
 Top 


Re: What are the major differences between 1939 Senior Packards and the 120?
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
I'll let others more familiar with this car comment in detail, but let me just comment on the sharing of IFS with the 120. When the senior cars went to IFS in 1937, it was based on the design already in use on the junior models, but they really didn't share all the exact same components. Spring capacities, rates, shock absorber valving, brakes, wheels, etc. were different, and there may have been other differences as well but I'm not really familiar with them in detail though a quick glance through the parts book should show where differences existed.

Posted on: 2008/10/29 12:14
 Top 


Re: New Packard owner questions....
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
Yeah Jack, I'm a bit suprised also that it doesn't have a FLAMMABLE and TOXIC shipping label, though the product label contains both warnings. I spent a lot of years doing health and safety labeling for hazardous chemicals, I'm not an expert on shipping classifications but I'm also suprised to find that loaded ammunition and gunpower just comes regular mail or UPS despite it's hazards. The bottle carries profuse and professionally written safety warnings, and the label states that it contains 14.8 grams of tetraethyl lead per quart. It also states that the mixture is "EPA Registered" though it's unclear to me just what that means. Directions for use indicate that 1 quart per 10 gallons of gasoline will raise the octane about 1 point, and 3 quarts per 20 gallons will raise 99.5 octane gasoline to 103. I don't think it's relevant whether that's "research" or "motor" method for this statement.

What I can say about it is about a quart every other tank fillup essentially quenches the preignition that I get on hard fast drives.

Posted on: 2008/10/28 18:39
 Top 


Re: postwar Coachbuilt Packards
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
Photo isnt clear enough to be certain, but that MAY be a '51-52 upper shell.

I don't believe so, the upper corners of the windshield are square and they were rounded on the 51-52 models weren't they?

Posted on: 2008/10/28 18:12
 Top 


Re: postwar Coachbuilt Packards
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
Ah, a wannabe Derham. Thanks Kev, when I ran across that picture in my file I couldn't remember where it came from or those details.

Posted on: 2008/10/28 17:20
 Top 


Re: postwar Coachbuilt Packards
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
Here's a cousin, it not quite so nice condition. And another (1953) in very fine condition, this one with a divider window.

Attach file:



jpg  (129.36 KB)
177_490762dab07ae.jpg 1024X768 px

jpg  (108.62 KB)
177_490763c34d393.jpg 1024X768 px

Posted on: 2008/10/28 14:07
 Top 


Re: Matt's 39 Touring
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
Your temperature extremes in Milford CT are about the same as mine in NJ; I use my cars rarely in the winter and hence heater output is not too relevant and do occasional long, hot parades on July 4th so I've opted for the 160 degree and you may wish to do the same though engine efficiency will be a bit improved with the higher thermostat.

I forget what model 39 you have, does it also have a shutter-stat?

Posted on: 2008/10/28 14:03
 Top 



TopTop
« 1 ... 1505 1506 1507 (1508) 1509 1510 1511 ... 1587 »



Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved