Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
193 user(s) are online (118 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 192

su8overdrive, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal

Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (kevinpackard)




Re: Morticus' Packard 200 Deluxe Touring Edition
#61
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
Quote:

Ross wrote:
Just lengthen the pull rod to the carb a bit until you like the way the trans upshifts. There is a singular lack of rocket science involved. Besides, that is likely all that got changed when the carb was taken off.


Sounds good. I figured it was probably simpler than the manual made it seem.

Posted on: 3/15 23:15
 Top 


Re: Morticus' Packard 200 Deluxe Touring Edition
#62
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
HPH - the gauge specified in 50T-33 is PU 364

Posted on: 3/15 16:48
 Top 


Re: Auto City Classics 1951-1956 Packard OE Finish Steel Gas Tank TS5156PKQ
#63
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
I have one of their tanks on my '54 and my brother in law has one on his '52. I got mine back in 2020, his was 2023. The two tanks are slightly different. Mine was painted silver, his is bare galvanized steel. The bends on the necks are slightly different, with the newer one being better.

I've had no issues with my tank. The brand new sender I got from them never worked though. Still didn't work after adding a ground, testing the wiring, and replacing the fuel gauge.

My brother in law is the opposite. The new sender works great. But the threaded bung for the fuel line slipped/rotated when tightening the flare for the fuel line. Now it leaks gas. Maybe the bung wasn't crimped hard enough from the factory. Or we tightened the fuel line too much. Either way, that will need to get fixed now. No response from AutoCity Classics.

Overall great tanks and now we'll never have an issue with dirty fuel again. But be mindful of how much force you put on the bungs.

-Kevin

Posted on: 3/15 11:06
 Top 


Re: fuel pump
#64
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
What year/model is the car? What engine?

Posted on: 3/14 17:54
 Top 


Re: Morticus' Packard 200 Deluxe Touring Edition
#65
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
Thanks both of you. The car goes into direct drive MUCH sooner than my '54. Mine shifts at about 35 which I believe is normal. His '52 shifts at 15-20mph.

HPH, that helps. We'll mess around with that setting and see what we get. Are you saying adjust the throttle linkage or the linkage at the trans?

Howard, I'll look around for Ross's posts on this. The manual talks about using the positioning gauges which we don't have.

Posted on: 3/14 12:30
 Top 


Re: Morticus' Packard 200 Deluxe Touring Edition
#66
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
Quote:

HH56 wrote:
Could be the linkage adjustment but don't forget on original Ultras there is no downshift as such because for normal driving trans starts and stays in high range. If car is below a certain speed it drops out of direct drive into high range converter for the extra burst of speed but that feature is locked out if going over 45-50 mph. Manual says if going over 50 but after so many years that given speed can be different due to linkage adj, different tires, speedo gear, etc etc.


The early Ultramatics are different from the later years, like '54? His 52' was allowing the kick-down out of direct drive before, I assume under 40mph. But it is not working now, after the carb rebuild. My assumption is the carb linkage needs to be adjusted. It does still drop out of direct drive once under 10mph.

Posted on: 3/14 11:56
 Top 


Re: Morticus' Packard 200 Deluxe Touring Edition
#67
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
Morticus has been enjoying the car and tackling projects as time allows. He replaced a leaking master cylinder and just finished rebuilding the original carb. Brakes seem to working very well now, and the rebuilt carb has made a big difference. Still dealing with the collapsed lifter ticking and dead cylinder #8, which we hope to address sometime this spring.

Two things have come up:
1.) The transmission doesn't want to kick down into torque converter when flooring the gas. I believe it's an adjustment on the linkage, which we will need to research and learn how to do.
2.) The new fuel tank has unfortunately developed a leak at the threaded bung for the fuel line. We've been chasing a leak in the area for a while and initially thought it was due to bad threads/bad flare. But then it became apparent that the bung was twisting in either direction about 1/4". I put in an email to Auto City Classics to see if this was a warranty problem but haven't heard back. Now we are looking at dropping the tank and either braising the bung or doing silver solder.




-Kevin

Posted on: 3/14 10:44
 Top 


Re: For Sale: coil base...1939 Super Eight?
#68
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
I'm pretty sure the same coil base will work on a '38 Super Eight, and probably a '37 also. What you have looks exactly like the one on my dad's '38.

-Kevin

Posted on: 3/13 15:19
 Top 


Re: Various CL Pickings
#69
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
Well, I will be picking up that '53 Sportster in the next few weeks. The guy made me an offer I can't refuse. I'll bring it back, evaluate and go from there. Likely just a parts car at this point so I'll strip what I need. Might talk to David Moe at Seattle Packards to see if he wants the rest of the car. If there's anything useful on it I would hate to see it go to the crusher.

Posted on: 3/12 11:42
 Top 


Re: KPack's 1954 Panama
#70
Home away from home
Home away from home

kevinpackard
Quote:

humanpotatohybrid wrote:
Quote:

kevinpackard wrote:
Quote:

humanpotatohybrid wrote:
Not to be too critical but those still look grooved in your "after" picture. Any reason why you didn't turn them nearly smooth?


I polished the commutator again after clearing out the grooves. I don't have a lathe, so I'm just using fine sandpaper. That's not going to take down the ridges that have been worn into it by the brushes. If you're talking about the grooves with the mica, I'm pretty sure those grooves are supposed to be there. They were pretty obviously there before.


Yes, of course there are the grooves between the contacts. I meant the circumferential grooving/wear. What I do is just stick it in a drill chuck then use a sanding sponge, that tends to get it pretty darn good without the need for a lathe. Just a suggestion. 🙂


That's a good idea. I'm not sure my drill will open that much, but I'll try. Otherwise, I might know a guy with a lathe. I'll check with him and see.

Posted on: 3/12 11:38
 Top 



TopTop
« 1 ... 4 5 6 (7) 8 9 10 ... 140 »



Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved