Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
230 user(s) are online (137 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 4
Guests: 226

Todd W. White, Don B, moodydavid16, jwblazek, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2)

Re: '55 Patrician Durability Test
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Nothing wrong with vacuum wipers at all as long as "proper service and maintenance" is provided to the wiper system.

HOWEVER, note that when ever the age old phrase : "proper service and maintenance" is ever used it implies a short service life and HIGH MAINTENACE system relative to alternative systems.

In this case the alternative is ELECTRIC wipers. Ever heard of anyone that had to perform much maintenance on electric wipers???

Posted on: 2014/12/23 18:57
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '55 Patrician Durability Test
#12
Home away from home
Home away from home

Steve203
See User information
Quote:

PackardV8 wrote:
Nothing wrong with vacuum wipers at all as long as "proper service and maintenance" is provided to the wiper system.

HOWEVER, note that when ever the age old phrase : "proper service and maintenance" is ever used it implies a short service life and HIGH MAINTENACE system relative to alternative systems.

In this case the alternative is ELECTRIC wipers. Ever heard of anyone that had to perform much maintenance on electric wipers???


Offhand, I don't recall that 64 Rambler ever requiring work on the wipers, and we had it 8 years. I remember the carb issue, the grabby brakes when it sat outside in high humidity, the time the brakes froze after driving through drifted snow, and the ceramic coated exhaust system giving out, but not a wiper issue. AMC seemed to have come up with a pretty robust system, robust enough for them to persist with it as long as they did.

This thread got me wondering what AMC did to ensure the vacuum wipers would never completely stop. Found the answer on an AMC forum. They had a vacuum pump piggybacked on the fuel pump.

Attach file:



jpg  (15.76 KB)
53041_549a26cd8ca90.jpg 500X375 px

Posted on: 2014/12/23 21:37
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '55 Patrician Durability Test
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Yep. and that is one expensive fuel pump too. IIRC about $80 ca, 1970 compared to a standard fuel pump at about $15. Bottom line: HIGH maintenance. In this case just to replace a fuel pump.

Posted on: 2014/12/24 1:01
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2)




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved