Happy Easter and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
114 user(s) are online (67 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 113

Peter Packard, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

Garrett Meadows
See User information
Relative to Packs, which is easier to drive: shift on the floor or column? Or does it matter?

I learned to drive with the shift on the column because both my parents had cars with shifts on the columns. Later, I got a car with a shift on the floor, and I can't say that I preferred one over the other. However, having the shift on the column did make for it roomier in the knee area and having to reach over and pick stuff up off the passenger-side floor-board.

Kind regards
Garrett Meadows

Posted on: 2014/7/17 0:57
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home

bkazmer
See User information
it doesn't matter. Now that 1940's column shifter has it's issues if worn, but it's not because it's on the column

Posted on: 2014/7/17 9:57
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home

Tim Cole
See User information
It depends on the vehicle. Old Corvettes - good to poor. Hurst shifters - good. Jaguar E-type - excellent, Dino Ferrari - excellent. Old worn Packards - column shift - poor. Old Cadillacs - very good, Old Chevys - fair to good.

Posted on: 2014/7/17 13:06
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

Dan
See User information
When I was really little, Dad bought one of those generic floor shifter kits for our '47 Clipper. I have no idea why he did that.

I had occasion to drive a '63 Mercedes 220 with a FOUR-speed shifter on the column. Interesting!

Personally, although I know why manufacturers went w/column shifters, I prefer 'em on the floor.

Posted on: 2014/7/17 15:53
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home

JWL
See User information
MIDan, that shift kit must have had an interesting shift pattern. My guess is it was backwards from normal (1st up, Rev. down; and 2nd down, High up) because of the shifting arms being on the top of the case. That is unless your dad installed some idler arms to change direction of the motion from the shift lever. Maybe someone else here can comment on what I have just written, but it seems this is the way it would have been.

(o{}o)

Posted on: 2014/7/17 16:04
We move toward
And make happen
What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer)
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#6
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
I can think of several European cars that had 4 forward speed shifters on the column, the 2 liter Triumph roadsters 1948 to 50, and some postwar Singers come to mind. First gear was where reverse would normally have been on a 3-speed and the others followed in the usual pattern. There was always some sort of interlock for Reverse, in the Triumph it was done by pulling outward on the knob at the end of the column, pushing the stick rearward and down. Column shift with 4-forward speeds was more common than you might think.

Posted on: 2014/7/17 16:29
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home

bobp
See User information
Old Simca Aronde had 4 on the column also.

Posted on: 2014/7/17 18:23
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#8
Home away from home
Home away from home

JWL
See User information
As did Mercedes Benz.

(o{}o)

Posted on: 2014/7/17 21:32
We move toward
And make happen
What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer)
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#9
Home away from home
Home away from home

David Grubbs
See User information
Ditto for 404 Peugeots. Standard 3 speed on the column, but then push forward and down for 4th.

Posted on: 2014/7/17 22:14
 Top  Print 
 


Re: Easier to drive: shift on the floor or column?
#10
Home away from home
Home away from home

Dan
See User information
Quote:

JW wrote:
MIDan, that shift kit must have had an interesting shift pattern. My guess is it was backwards from normal (1st up, Rev. down; and 2nd down, High up) because of the shifting arms being on the top of the case. That is unless your dad installed some idler arms to change direction of the motion from the shift lever. Maybe someone else here can comment on what I have just written, but it seems this is the way it would have been.

(o{}o)


JW, it's entirely possible that Dad did that. I was 6-7-8 years old at the time (early 1960s), so I have no idea at all how he did it, just that he managed to install it...

I DO know that after he bought a brand-new 1965 Checker Marathon, he quit driving the Packard. In 1968, he traded it and 3 other cars for a running, driving Renault Dauphine, of all things...

Posted on: 2014/7/18 7:54
 Top  Print 
 








Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved