Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
75 user(s) are online (56 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 3
Guests: 72

AA115C, Alvin14, Jack Vines, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 2 3 (4)

Re: Survival revisitted
#31
Home away from home
Home away from home

Mahoning63
See User information
Here's a pic of Patrician body from the '56 Data Book. At left one can see inner structure that supports the roof by connecting it to the wheelhouse, which in turn connects to the lower body structure. This inner structure probably also connects to the package shelf (not shown) behind the rear seats, which supports the end panel (also not shown) that fills the space between decklid and rear window. The end panel is what supports the decklid. On the Four Hundred, a standard 122" wb hardtop roof is used, moved forward 5 inches to sit on 127" wb frame. The extra 5 inches between roof and decklid are taken up by a 5 inch wider end panel.

This is just a guess but to save tooling costs, perhaps Packard simply used that same inner structure roof support twice, the forward one connecting to a wheelhouse forward section only, to connect the roof to the rest of body as in the sedan. The second wheelhouse, a full one, would have then been positioned 5 inches rearward, and above it a second, identical inner structure providing additional support to the wider end panel. For those folks who have restored these cars does any of this smell remotely familiar?

Attach file:



jpg  (49.06 KB)
2060_5704255d6f56c.jpg 943X629 px

Posted on: 2016/4/5 15:51
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Survival revisitted
#32
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
The article in The Cormorant about the use of "plastic tooling" to extend the 54 hardtop and convertible to the 127" wheelbase for 1955 was by George Hamlin and published in the Summer 1975 issue (thanks to Stuart Blond for digging up that info). The article itself is copyright protected but this illustration from "The Iron Age" magazine was included and shows how it was accomplished.

Attach file:



jpg  (138.67 KB)
177_57050be0920c1.jpg 1280X986 px

Posted on: 2016/4/6 8:15
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Survival revisitted
#33
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

BH
See User information
Ross wrote:

Quote:
Even the rear door skins were stamped on the same die, they were just "short sheeted" and trimmed for the juniors.

I agree - at least for 56th Series.

What the casual observer may not know is that there are several dies involved in producing any deep-drawn sheet metal part. Not only are seperate sets of dies used for forming, punching, and trimming operations, but several sets of dies may be required just for forming - depending on the complexity of the shape. I watched this, decades ago, on a tour of Chrysler's Twinsburg, OH stamping plant. Watching the panels being flipped from one die to the next so fast that it reminded me of someone rolling a coin across the back of their knuckles.

So, I can see where a rear door outer panel stamping destined for Junior, rather than Senior, would be diverted to a set of punching dies that excludes the pocket/opening for the courtesy lamp, then - if not simply "short-sheeted" - a set of final trimming and forming dies to establish the alternate perimieter and upset the edge (which would later be folded over the flange of the inner panel).

While this works perfectly for 56th Series, where the bulge is the same shape betwen Junior and Senior, the 55th Series Junior panel carried the lines from the 54th Series. They must have retooled forming dies for 55th Series Seniors, then extended that to include Juniors for 56th Series.

Bottom line, this example of production engineering was smart and economical, while delivering pleasing aesthetics.

Posted on: 2016/4/6 8:41
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Survival revisitted
#34
Home away from home
Home away from home

Mahoning63
See User information
Today's market shift back to taller vehicles is reminder that not everyone back in '57 may have wanted a super low car. Here's a work-up that keeps Packard's taller height and instead works on proportions, with five inches added to rear overhang and front axle-to-dash. Reverse doors only if front-hinged could not have been made to work. Most of the body dies would have been carried over, several modified and only the hood and front fenders made new. Like the 1937 Seniors, these cars would have won not with the latest styling trends but with styling refinement and advanced engineering. Together with a Studebaker-based Clipper would have made for a fairly fresh showroom.

Attach file:



jpg  (82.30 KB)
2060_5725e83490fdd.jpg 1021X479 px

jpg  (58.61 KB)
2060_5725ea2b27403.jpg 612X944 px

Posted on: 2016/5/1 6:43
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 2 3 (4)




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved