Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
88 user(s) are online (66 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 2
Guests: 86

Mechagon, Mike Chirco, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



(1) 2 3 »

1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#1
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Tom in KCMO
See User information
The '48 "Woodie" has been battling overheating for some time now. It always ran hot and last weekend it seems to have overheated at the Ottawa, KS cruise. Once home the radiator was about a quart low (below the top of the core) and had oil in the coolant. I pulled the head this week and from the scorch marks, it looks like there was some leakage between cylinders and also into the coolant passages. The head is at the local head shop (ha!) for cleaning and inspection and my fingers are crossed that they'll find no serious warpage.

Couple of questions:
1. Is there a specification for the washers that go under the head nuts (thick ness and hardness)? I'm replacing the nuts (McMaster-Carr) and figure the washers should be replaced as well.
2. Is there a proper 'height' specification for the studs (height from the block)? Several are taller or shorter than the others.
3. Has anyone tried power-coating an engine head? Will the coating stand up to the heat?

Thanks,

Tom in KC

Attach file:



jpg  (222.39 KB)
32490_59c5768023783.jpg 1920X1440 px

jpg  (364.10 KB)
32490_59c5768dd82cc.jpg 1920X1440 px

jpg  (452.82 KB)
32490_59c5769986486.jpg 1920X1440 px

jpg  (287.50 KB)
32490_59c576a86aa66.jpg 1440X1920 px

Posted on: 2017/9/22 15:47
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#2
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
For what it's worth here is a photo of a block from the SM. To me it appears the studs were mostly threaded down to the end of the threads but doesn't look like they were concerned that much about all tops being the same height even coming from the factory.

From the parts manual, the length of the studs are given and the utility section has the specs for the washer and nut.

There was a change in the threads on the studs which could affect your engine. The article is specific in stating the two threads are not interchangeable and from personal experience I can attest that threading the rolled type stud into a block with the cut threads can be very difficult. If someone has mixed them in the past there could be some issues in getting the height down to approximately the end of the threaded section. If the studs won't go down far enough McMaster has some extra thick washers that might work better than standards.

Attach file:



jpg  (60.29 KB)
209_59c581965dca8.jpg 1310X496 px

jpg  (86.25 KB)
209_59c581a584311.jpg 1196X600 px

jpg  (84.22 KB)
209_59c581b15139d.jpg 510X1358 px

Posted on: 2017/9/22 16:39
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#3
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
When I need new washers I buy aircraft quality with the faces ground flat and parallel to very tight tolerance; probably overkill but its only a few $. I get them from MSC Industrial Supply.

I see you using a die to clean the stud threads - if it's a nice new die, not the best practice. Yes, you want the threads CLEAN, butyou don't want to remove any metal as it decreases the load-bearing surface. Better to use a thread chaser, or an old, well worn die that just cuts the debris from the grooves.

Posted on: 2017/9/22 17:18
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#4
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Tom in KCMO
See User information
Thanks for all of the information. New washers are on the way!

The one stud that appears to be a real problem is screwed further into the block than the others. The corresponding nut was only about 3/4 threaded onto the stud. I plan to carefully try to back this stud out and get a length measurement. It may need to be replaced. The rolled versus cut thread info will be handy if replacement is needed.

The stud threads were really crudded up. The die removed a lot of rust and dirt but it didn't appear to remove a whole lot of metal. At least that was noticeable. I will remember the advice about not using a new die for next time..... Come to think of it, I probably now have a somewhat worn die for next time.

Many Thanks to all!

Tom

Posted on: 2017/9/22 18:19
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home

JWL
See User information
Tom, I would carefully inspect the engine block for cracks while the head is off and you are doing work on it. Opinion differs on whether to use a copper gasket sealant when installing the new head gasket. Regardless, proper torquing of the nuts at assembly and following-up is most important.

JWL

Posted on: 2017/9/23 10:51
We move toward
And make happen
What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer)
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#6
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

50 2382
See User information
Well, my 288 rebuild taught me a lot.

Use copper sealant if you use a copper gasket. I didn't the first time and when I filled the engine with coolant it immediately leaked into the cylinders and ruined my 1st rebuild. Copper sealant will fill the slight imperfections in the head and block.

Make real sure you don't have a crack in the block. Use magnaflux or some other dye to check. My first block didn't reveal its ugly cracks until after my machine shop cleaned the block. We found a crack from an exhaust valve seat all the way into and down the adjoining cylinder. Garbage, so different block.

If you have the engine out run it on a test stand before you install it. This will give you the opportunity to break in the rings and cam (if it is new) then you can tune it and adjust the valves hot. (no crawling under the car to make the adjustments with the engine running).

Good luck!

Posted on: 2017/9/23 12:00
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#7
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Tom in KCMO
See User information
OK,thanks, have a dye kit on order. Will inspect carefully.

Tom

Posted on: 2017/9/23 13:04
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#8
Home away from home
Home away from home

Packard Don
See User information
As I recall, the head washers were thicker than off the shelf hardware washers. Probably close to 1/8" and had a larger outside diameter. I have a jar of them at my shop but it's hundreds of miles away so not easy to check!

Posted on: 2017/9/23 13:52
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#9
Home away from home
Home away from home

Fish'n Jim
See User information
No one answered on the powder coating question, so if you do, use high temp powders, just for less possible discoloration over time.
I don't see a need with the modern engine paints, however. They are good to 500+F and seem to be easy to apply. I did the Cad with Eastwoods, only to get the color. Rattle cans are OK too for something like a head.
You can ceramic coat also, and preserve an unpainted cast iron look, but neither of the thermals were factory finishes. They came out spray painted at the factory. Any thermal coating is going to require an oven bake before to devolatilize and after to cure. Cracks can grow from thermal cycles. So consider you're needs before your options. You don't want to do all that head work only to get a crack after/from appearance coating.
ps: I'd opt for new studs. Cleaning rusty threads doesn't ensure integrity. If you snap one during torque, it's start over.

Posted on: 2017/9/25 9:02
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1948 288 Engine Head Refurbish
#10
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Tom in KCMO
See User information
Hi Folks,

Many thanks for all the great info. Couple of updates:

1. The head came back from the shop. It's not too bad with the worst warp at 0.007". It does have some gasket etching as well. See picture. The shop recommends taking off about 0.010" to flatten everything out. Before they do this, I plan to do the modeling clay trick (torque the head down on the old gasket with some modeling clay over the valves, turn the engine over x4, remove head & measure free clearance above the valves). Once valve to head clearances are known I'll talk to the shop about going forward (or not) with milling.

2. Crack penetrating dye kit is on order and I'll test the block once it arrives. Hopefully no issues.

3. After reviewing some of the posts and speaking with the head shop, I decided to go the paint route for the engine head. Have some high temp engine primer and engine gray on order.

4. At this point I plan to go with the existing studs. With the exception of the one low one they don't seem to be too bad and the threads cleaned up nicely. My worry is that the replacement process (risk of breaking a stud) may be worse than just going with what's there.

Again, thanks for all of the help, suggestions and advice.

Best Regards,

Tom

Attach file:



jpg  (347.88 KB)
32490_59ca702457b05.jpg 1920X1440 px

jpg  (392.69 KB)
32490_59ca703026f9a.jpg 1920X1440 px

Posted on: 2017/9/26 10:21
 Top  Print   
 




(1) 2 3 »




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved