Re: 1949 Packard 288 Full Restoration Project in Florida

Posted by FlippinMastaT On 2023/1/11 19:28:35
Quote:

Fish'n Jim wrote:
If the crank was at spec, then must be low miles? Odometer reading?
I suspect since it was not a wear issue, that maybe one or more valves or rings were stuck giving the "0" compression and may have avoided a rebuild. ie; it had to turn over to get those figures. No signs of cracks or other causes/leaks were noted.
Starting fresh is good, no issue, just curious. My '49 odo was around 45K, reportedly sat 5 years, and it ran just fine after resurrection. Took about a month to get it all repaired. Slight valve noise in need of adjustment but idled nicely and quietly at 400 with no overheat. Glad I didn't tear motor down. I was deciding whether to restore or hot rod. I drove it around the neighborhood for a while before tearing it apart as it sits.
Wish I had your enthusiasm.


I'll check the odometer this weekend. I think it is somewhere in the 40k range. The low compression was due to the piston rings being broken on a few of the cylinders and frozen to where there was no spring on a few others. I have run into this issue before on a few other motors in the past that have just sat for a long time.

This was my second flathead motor and first straight 8 that I have worked on, so I wasn't too disappointed about having to do a rebuild.

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=252631