Re: Why no Packard in a "Packard"?

Posted by Ross On 2012/4/19 12:25:11
Well done, and let me mention an important detail. Although Connor was doubtless too small and cramped--I remember hearing stories of delivery trucks double parked as there was no place to offload-- the comparison of square footage between East Grand and Connor is not quite fair. The engine and transmission production, and I think axles and suspension parts was now done at Utica instead of East Grand. A great deal of that 3 million square feet had been used for that and foundry, not final assembly.

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=99539