Re: Crazy idea...

Posted by 55PackardGuy On 2011/12/9 22:18:56
Quote:

BlackBeerd wrote:
These mods to the cars might have killed efficiencies, but the output of the exhaust was much better for the earth . . . the automotive industry has made great gains in efficiency while still controlling dangerous emissions.


BlackBeerd,

Maybe you missed this part:

Quote:
Those were poor applications of technology that, I have to admit, has done us a lot of good in the long haul.


And one big question I have always had, related to the old days and "killing efficiencies" is this:

Quote:
my question always was, "What was the net gain of ppm of pollutants if a car was using 1/3 more gas to travel the same distance, and burning that much more fuel?" If, for instance, the drop in emissions was 1/3 lower per gallon of fuel, it would be a wash-- except for the oil companies, where it would be a definite gain! And yet, no one ever seemed to have those numbers.


Anyone have those numbers? Maybe it was necessary to do these experiments to get where we are today with emissions, but I still wonder if in the rush to reduce emissions of bad stuff, and the resulting patchwork of "fixes" actually INCREASED overall emissions for many years, due to more gasoline being burned.

(Also, please note, I am promoting applying some of the more do-able emissions control systems to earlier model cars here.)

And Snapey, thank you for your always appropriate comments!

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=91065