Re: 22 Series 327 in a 17 Series Super 8?

Posted by 58L8134 On 2011/8/12 8:03:36

"...Actually, I think you have "hit the nail on the head". That is the decision I've come to on this. Packard, based on this literature, has already "sanctioned" this type of engine replacement as being within a legitimate action taken by Packard dealers. So, why should we look at it any differently, or maybe I'm just trying to convince myself. Either way, the result is the same."

Hi Gene

I endorse your decision to make this engine swap, both on the practical usage you intend to make and on the realistic conclusion that restoration of the 320 ci is beyond your mechanical and financial capability.
Frankly, Packard service letters detailing this swap where a tacit admission this heavily-modified version to fit in the Junior chassis wasn't one of their more robust powerplants. At the time those cars were still used cars from which their owners expected continued service. The fact the engine proved not as durable and troublefree as their usual reputation caused more potential customer loss, unless a suitable replacement could be supplied.

The only compelling reason to stay with the original engine is if the car is a convertible coupe or convertible sedan to maintain it's resale value. Any of the sedans or coupe are not so rare that a conversion should be an issue. When the car is restored and you're enjoying it, continue to gather the necessary parts etc. for the 320, restoring those that you are able without huge investment.
Then, when a purist takes you to task for the swap, inform him that you have the 320 awaiting and ready for restoration and that if he wants to foot the bill, you'll be glad to swap the restored 320 back into the car. Nothing like a fellow having to put his money where his mouth is to bring him to reality!

Steve

BTW: I've considered a postwar 288/327 swap into a '20's Six with a missing engine.