Sorry but to me too nebulous to be truth-apt. If one tries to define the boundary of
"a copy" that includes a 338 cui cast aluminum engine with centrifugal filter or would search for a name of
"the 55-56 Packard" equipped with mechanical operated pushbuttons but without TL or just counts the quantity of doors of the convertible then he would probably come under pressure for failing to offer a convincing explanation. How about the straight-toothed differential, not to mention the backbone tube chassis ...
Please don't get me wrong. The overwhelming evidence for a Packard design pattern conglomerate is all over town. But to copy means to duplicate, at least in legal terms. A small part of her Soviet
skirt is hanging down below her Packard coat.
Attach file:
(34.69 KB)
This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=92361