Re: Lost in the '50's!
Posted by Ozstatman On 2016/11/5 21:26:11
"....the Nash is a 48, not a 58 as the title of the pic states"
Keith,
I could lie and say it was a slip of my typing finger, instead it was a slip between the brain and the finger!
When taking pic's I usually try to take one of the caption displayed with the car so it's easier for later identification, see the pic below. Obviously didn't work this time!
Just now, in googling images of '48 then '50 Nash's see that Jay Leno has a '50! Must be a really rare and desirable car!!!!!!
Attach file:
(30.98 KB)
Keith,
I could lie and say it was a slip of my typing finger, instead it was a slip between the brain and the finger! When taking pic's I usually try to take one of the caption displayed with the car so it's easier for later identification, see the pic below. Obviously didn't work this time!
Just now, in googling images of '48 then '50 Nash's see that Jay Leno has a '50! Must be a really rare and desirable car!!!!!!
Attach file:
(30.98 KB)
This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=184137