55 - looks decent for the price, depends on mileage and maintenance. Poor paint job around the rear 1/4 panels... I'm sure there's Bondo hiding
35 - "only" 77k miles and firm on price but he won't wash it for you...
28 - is that restorable or do you think the mechanical parts are too far gone?
40 - very nice and the price looks right
-
-
-
-
56 - this 400 has been up for a while. I don't really see what the appeal is of putting resto rod seats and door cards in an otherwise very nice car. The maroon doesn't pair well at all with the scarlet red.
55 - nice color HT though the fender skirts don't match in color. Looks like some free trippe lights (?) on the front but missing hubcaps, and no interior shots.
53 - have seen this posted before, and let's say I'm not surprised it's still for sale. Nearly everything that was repaired for aesthetic reasons was done in the complete wrong direction, such as the body-painted chrome. For 15k. Even the tires still look ancient.
55 - Rear seat obviously redone in the past, and lots of water damage in the interior. I can smell the rotted floor pan from here...
53 - price looks good but I agree white is not the best color on this.
40 - clean interior but that paint job would have to go...
37 - ah, the ol'
easy bake oven combo... great in the 50's, but just looks off on a '37. Wonder when the interior was redone.
-
51 - one looks like the seat was already redone then parked.
This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=257389
