Re: What would a traditional Packard "Senior" have looked like in 1951?
Posted by Packard5687 On 2017/8/17 17:10:18
<i>"here is suggested 300 sedan on 127 wb"</i>
Sorry, Paul - I just don't like those 200 rear fenders and taillights ... I think the rear fenders and taillights on the 300s/400s are more elegant.
I know that many formal sedans used more steel and less glass in the "c" pillars, but I've always felt that the way it is rendered on the 200 doesn't look elegant and doesn't translate to the desired formal look on more upmarket Packard sedans. To my eye, it just doesn't work on the 200.
That said, here's a treatment that (to my eye) DOES work by a man who goes by "harborindiana" on his Flickr photo stream:
Attach file:
(619.60 KB)
Sorry, Paul - I just don't like those 200 rear fenders and taillights ... I think the rear fenders and taillights on the 300s/400s are more elegant.
I know that many formal sedans used more steel and less glass in the "c" pillars, but I've always felt that the way it is rendered on the 200 doesn't look elegant and doesn't translate to the desired formal look on more upmarket Packard sedans. To my eye, it just doesn't work on the 200.
That said, here's a treatment that (to my eye) DOES work by a man who goes by "harborindiana" on his Flickr photo stream:
Attach file:
(619.60 KB)
This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=195047