Re: 1952 327 Connecting Rod Help/Suggestions

Posted by WPE On 2018/12/26 16:12:30
This is an interesting point you bring up 327 v 288 head. I was always under the impression that the 288 head mounted to the 327 block was the better performance option since the 288 offered higher compression and then all you had to do was porting/polishing of the bowls/chambers. What I state seems to be widely published on the web forums.

Are you saying that because of my election to supercharge the engine, I'd benefit from the lower compression of the 327 head? again, assuming I am able to optimize the bowls/chambers of the 288 head to be as good or better than what is in the 327. w-

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=208298