Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
Posted by Dave Kenney On 2009/12/30 20:48:02
Quote:
Turbopackman wrote:
Funny they did it this way, as the 9 main 327 has integral counter weights and is the same length. There must have been a different reason for doing it that way.
That's what makes me curious as well? If technology existed in 1935 to make a one piece crankshaft for the 120 and subsequent inline engines why would Packard use the 1920's technology from the 385 and 320 engines up until 1950 in the 356?
This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=44062