Re: this is just beautiful!

Posted by Jim L. in OR On 2011/3/4 12:30:52
Quote:

Owen_Dyneto wrote:
The upside to this is that decent, unrestored cars are beginning (again, as in the 50s) to get more respect at shows and from the national organizations. For example, AACA's HPOF and CCCA's Touring Class. In my view, a well-preserved and maintained original car can be far more interesting than a restored example.

One reason the costs of restoration have risen, other than the inflation of costs of labor and services, is that the standards have risen dramatically, especially at the elite national forums. A well-done premium restoration of the 50s or 60s wouldn't even be an also-ran at Amelia Island, Pebble, etc. today.

I just cringe when I see a car advertised as "fully restored from a near-perfect original". Nuff to bring tears.



I couldn't agree with you more O-D, especially your last paragraph.

The main reason I bought my '55 is that it is such a well kept original needing almost nothing - aside from not running that is. My intent (once I get it running) is to preserve it - and has been since I first laid eyes on it.

My 51 is a different story. It has issues such as rusty floors and an aftermarket paint job. It will be a fun driver - preserved enough so that if someone after me wants to restore it they'll have a solid body (once the floor is patched) to work with.

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=71868