Re: 1954 Packard conv. with 327 engine

Posted by Mike On 2011/6/8 8:47:06
54 359 would be a 4 bbl right?

51 327 could/would be a 2bbl? Did he at least leave the 4 bbl setup on?

J is 51, but the serial number reference on the site here doesn't show that something starting with J3 falls into the 51, maybe a number misread?

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=78741