Re: Legit Question: Not in X-Ref

Posted by HH56 On 2012/9/27 19:01:39

When the car was new probably the motor number was used. I believe that was what Packard recommended. It also appears since there was no standard method in use like modern VIN's each state was able to pick and choose whichever number on the car they liked that fit their needs. Upon later re-registering, particularly with only a bill of sale, it appears lots of states used the thief proof number because it was permanent and prominent.

My 47 is one of those registered with the thief proof number. In my case it was because the car was unlicensed for a long time and title had been out of the Calif system for years. No previous record existed as they only stay inactive in the system here for 5 years.

When the car was re-registered and inspected, even though there was a title the inspector chose the thief proof number because he saw it couldn't be removed. My 56 on the other hand had always been registered and licensed so when I got it title was transferred and registered with the normal number.