Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
Posted by Eric Boyle On 2010/1/1 13:17:12
Quote:
Yup, absolutely. I don't have a problem putting different years of Packard engines in different years of cars, but at least use a Packard engine in it. Even if it's a 320/352/374 in a '37 115 it's still ok in my book. The only time a non-Packard engine should be used is if you're using a BTV and need something attached to a chain to throw out the door to stop.
I get your point,but to me a Chevy engine in a Packard means it's no longer a Packard, just a another mongrel.
Yup, absolutely. I don't have a problem putting different years of Packard engines in different years of cars, but at least use a Packard engine in it. Even if it's a 320/352/374 in a '37 115 it's still ok in my book. The only time a non-Packard engine should be used is if you're using a BTV and need something attached to a chain to throw out the door to stop.
This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=44211