Re: The 1952/53 Monte Carlo

Posted by BH On 2010/10/22 10:01:35
Quote:
It's said to have been a miserable road car (inadequate body structural stability)...


I would like to think that, between Packard and the builder (Henney), they would have had enough engineering sense to use a convertible frame and related reinforcement techniques to compensate for the structural integrity that was lost in a closed car to - what is, for all practical purposes - an open design.

However, with the front half of the roof removed, the rest of the roof would act like a parachute and had to make for terrible handling at anything above in-town speeds.

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=62544