Re: '56 Trunk Lock
Posted by BH On 2010/12/7 11:00:31
Quote:
I thought so, too, but with nothing on that in the Index that I compiled, I began to wonder if I might have overlooked one.
So, I combed through my collection of original SCs and dealer STBs, plus photcopies of "Zone only" STBs - nothing. No help from the SSBs, either.
Digging a little deeper into my personal collection, I found a set of Service Bulletins from Packard's Detroit Zone. Even when I worked for Chrysler in the mid-1980s, it was not uncommon for Zone Offices to issue their own service bulletins, though they usually only reiterate what had already been published by the central office - for emphasis to the dealers. Decades earlier, Packard was no different in that regard, but I'll cut to the chase.
A watermarked scan of a Detroit Zone Bulletin that may be the "missing link" is attached below; however, note that the P/N provided is a typo - should be 6478790.
Attach file:
(91.62 KB)
There is somekind of SC or STB or maybe it was a Studebaker bulletin from after 56 that addresses the rod length.
I thought so, too, but with nothing on that in the Index that I compiled, I began to wonder if I might have overlooked one.
So, I combed through my collection of original SCs and dealer STBs, plus photcopies of "Zone only" STBs - nothing. No help from the SSBs, either.
Digging a little deeper into my personal collection, I found a set of Service Bulletins from Packard's Detroit Zone. Even when I worked for Chrysler in the mid-1980s, it was not uncommon for Zone Offices to issue their own service bulletins, though they usually only reiterate what had already been published by the central office - for emphasis to the dealers. Decades earlier, Packard was no different in that regard, but I'll cut to the chase.
A watermarked scan of a Detroit Zone Bulletin that may be the "missing link" is attached below; however, note that the P/N provided is a typo - should be 6478790.
Attach file:
(91.62 KB)
This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=66124