Re: Proposed Modern Packard V12
Posted by BH On 2008/11/19 11:18:31
Well, I suspect that PI was formed, and continues to exist today, for some very legitimate reasons. Actually, I'm glad they're around; a little competition helps keep everyone on their toes.
That aside, there are probably more people who are members of both clubs, rather than just one or the other, but there are also plenty of Packard enthusiasts who have no interest in being either, yet they help keep the fire burning, too.
While it would have been nice to have both clubs pulling in the same direction to obtain the maximum number of cars and people at the Centennial, I find that the more people involved, the harder it is to get them all to agree to the same thing. As fate would have it, I only had a couple afternoons to spend at the Centennial, but there was plenty enough to take in.
Although I never saw Gullickson's Packard in person, I don't think I missed much.
That aside, there are probably more people who are members of both clubs, rather than just one or the other, but there are also plenty of Packard enthusiasts who have no interest in being either, yet they help keep the fire burning, too.
While it would have been nice to have both clubs pulling in the same direction to obtain the maximum number of cars and people at the Centennial, I find that the more people involved, the harder it is to get them all to agree to the same thing. As fate would have it, I only had a couple afternoons to spend at the Centennial, but there was plenty enough to take in.
Although I never saw Gullickson's Packard in person, I don't think I missed much.
This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=16598