Re: Your Opinion Whether the New '57 Packard Vertical Grille Would Have Been a Marketing Hit?

Posted by LINC400 On 2010/1/5 13:42:14
Quote:

MrPushbutton wrote:
I think that the vertical grille was a bit much, and another revolving example of how vestigial styling elements are thrown at "modern" (meaning current styles of the moment) by the marketing department or dealers--to whit: Vinyl tops. These began in the 60s, and on the square cars of that era were OK, they were really popular in the 70s and stuck around in the 80s as cars became even more boxier. Lincoln had those faux-convertible tops on the Town cars of that era. I thought that some of the more pleasing designs of the early 90s had been designed so that you couldn't put a vinyl roof on them, like the Chrysler LH cars. The dealers proved the stylists wrong, and did it anyhow, wheter it looked good or not. If there is money to be made, the dealer will do it.

Everything else about the '57 Packards pointed toward a contemporary automobile. The vertical grille is just the wrong shape on the right form, long and low--all horizontal motifs, the mode of the day. Had they been built I think they would have stood up well to the competition, I like the basket handle fin, although that would have been hell to manufacture. It stands out as different. One thing is for certain: a '57 Packard would have had a structurally superior body to any '57 Mopar product, that year began their entry into the dark ages of Chrysler body building, which lasted unitl Iacocca brought talent from Ford to tell them "you can't do it that way".

The history of American cars is dotted with these vestigial elements that won't go away fast enough, or when they should:
"Continental" bumps on Lincoln trunks
diecast "Portholes" on Buicks
Vinyl roofs on everything
chrome plated (plastic) "grilles" that resemble 1920s "form follows function radiator grilles/enclosures
Wooden artillery wheels--these persisted into the mid 1930s, long after the all-steel wheel was the way to go.

The oldtimers want something comfy that reminds them of the good ol' days. Ii have a lot of respect for a company that says "this is how a car should look NOW", like the Ford Tarus or the current Cadillacs. GM realized that if they wanted their product to appeal to someone ten years younger they better not make them all comfy-old-y, and for them it's working.


I have to disagree with a lot of this.

Continental humps started on the 1956 Mark II as a modern interpretation of the original Continental's rear mounted spare. Not only were they carried over to all following Mark series Lincolns, but there was a huge aftermarket supplying Continental humps for everything from Eldorados to Pintos. The Mark series outsold the Eldorado every year in the 1970's. So I may be biased, but I don't see how this is a vestigal element that should have gone away.

Buick portholes were not only requested by Buick customers, but they became such a must have bling thing that you can now buy them at Walmart and put them on anything. I don't see how Buick using their own trademark is a mistake.

Currently some of the most critically acclaimed cars carry vestigal styling cues. The Challenger, Camaro, and Mustang rely very heavily on retro styling. Even the new Cadillacs retain verticle taillights and an eggcrate grill. The original Taurus copied heavily from the 1949-51 Ford, right down to the lack of grill and badge placed where the bullet would have been on the 49-51. Cadillac carried over its tailfins from 1948-1964 with more modern interpretations of them every year. They absolutely clobbered everyone else in the luxury car field with these vestigal remains. Many cars have looked to the past for inspiration and then used a modern interpretation. Many of these designs are quite successful.

So since Packard customers were actually requesting a return to a verticle grill, I think that means they would have wanted a verticle grill on the 1957.

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=44466