Re: Thief-Proof Numbers (body serial numbers)

Posted by BDeB On 2011/3/13 18:59:30

Maybe 1955 stampings were started with a higher number sequence and later went back to the earlier numbers.
It would seem logical to assume that the numbers were stamped in sequence, but this may not have been the case, especially in 1955 with the change back to Packard produced bodies rather than Briggs.