Posting pics.

Posted by PackardV8 On 2011/7/20 9:41:01

Maybe it's just me. I don't know. But there mite be many others that are limited to less than the latest and greatest resources to compute with. I don;t know what the generaly accepted standard is for picture size but i'm guessing anything over 300KB mite cause extremely slow or aborted picture display for the viewer. Most anything under 100KB is great and usualy in the ranges of 30 to 80 KB seems to be most common place.

Is that a reasonable analysis or maybe i'm just so far behind the times that i need somekind of upgrade or what???