Re: What SINGLE factor MOST contributed to the demise of Packard?

Posted by Rusty O\'Toole On 2013/10/18 12:59:54
Quote:

Mahoning63 wrote:
There's more competence and entrepreneurialism on the hustling street corners of the ghetto than in the Boardrooms and CEO offices of American Capitalism Inc so if the ruling class is changing its address from Country Club Lane to 15th Street more power to America. One day these kids might redirect their energies and play a major role in digging us out of the mess that generations of well-bred private sector idiots created.

I've been taxied through Berlin in a Mercedes E-Class and it was a darn good car, just as competent as the stuff we see here. I've also been in a Crown Vic cabbie in NY and it was the same disgusting piece of cr@p that my great uncles drove. I also helped engineer (but had no authority to really fix) the 2000s Town Car. It was piece of cr@p with a suit. Mercedes and BMW have earned every penny they have taken in. Cadillac, Lincoln and Imperial deserve their current states... fair, poor and poof. As for Packard, they were the canary in the coal mine that warned of the wholly deficient post-war breeding techniques that America had adopted to grow its business leaders.


Wish I could say I rode in Packard taxicab (they did make them) and it was a darn good car, better than a DeSoto or Checker.

Wish I could also say that the popularity of Packard cabs proved its staying power in the most severe conditions, and convinced a lot of buyers that Packard was the car to buy in spite of its higher price, because you got quality and long service for your money.

If I could say that it would help dispel the myth that selling mass produced cars to Methodists killed Packard, and if they had only stuck to hand making a few hundred bespoke 12 cylinder limousines a year for millionaires they would still be in business.

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=133286