Re: '37 Pack convertible on "Chasing Classic Cars"

Posted by Garrett Meadows On 2016/9/7 12:45:38

Hi Steve!

Speaking of proverbs, your well-written comments remind that a word fittly spoken is like apples of gold in a setting of silver.

You know, a week or so ago, some guy in here chastized me for bringing up a non-Packard related question. In the short time I've been a member of the forum, he's the first to be a bit rude to me. Initially, I wanted to snap back with a rude response, but I stopped myself and apologized to the guy.

I told him that I had been lead to believe that not only was this forum for Packard enthusiasts, but also for classic car enthusiasts, such as myself. To me, while Packard has its own unique history, it is only one part of the extremely varied history of automobiles and automobile manufacturing, much of which overlaps.

The evolution of Packard was not only from the inside out, but also strongly influenced by external factors, such as the Depression, demographics, and in response to what other car manufacturers were doing. As such, I see Packard as an amalgam of sefl-generated initiatives AND global factors. To talk specifically about Packard is, in a way, to talk about automotive history in general.

Did any of that make an ounce of sense? I guess what I'm trying to say is that it's fun and very enjoyable not only to experience vicariously Packard ownership and history, but also to be able to inquire about all aspects of automotive history.

as always
Garrett M