Re: Did the public think of Imperial as Packard's replacement?

Posted by Chuckltd On 2009/8/8 8:13:40
This car had a one year only cam. The correct firing order had the wires split straight down the middle. Whenever I'd try buying parts for it, the stores always gave me 1978 LTD or 79 Tbird parts. I've owned both of those cars so I know what they used. The 83 required a wierd 3-prong rotor and used monolithic timing. Firing order was 1-3-4-8-6-5-7-2. The fuel "pumps" I should say, were in the tank and on the frame. Had a high pressure pump on frame and a low pressure one in the tank. Some 84's also used that setup. Don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking Lincolns in general. In fact I love the Mark IV and V, but the VI was a POS. The technology needlessly added to the car was overkill.

Attach file:



jpg  (186.17 KB)
1470_4a7d78911c344.jpg 1280X960 px

This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=34356