Re: The History of Packard

Posted by BigKev On 2008/10/9 15:09:16
I really think that Pete has good information to share, the problem is the abusive tone in his delivery of the information. Similar to the tone we had from PackPrince in his posts.

This is the core reason why he ask been banned from other website forums. If Pete can keep himself in check and converse with everyone in the same respectful tone that most of the other folks here do, then I have no problem. If not then perhaps Pete's welcome here has come to an end.

His good information gets ignored when it wrapped up in his "Post-War Packards are bad" manifesto he continually spouts. In one hand he complains that Packard was just a car assembler, not building anything themselves, then slams Packard for developing their own Automatic transmission.

No person that just bought a Post-War Packard and discovers this weeksite wants to hear over and over that the car they bought is a P.O.S. There is a time and place for every discussion, but not every post needs a "Corporate Suicide" history lesson. So folks enjoy their Packards and be able to post about them without the constant manta being spouted.



This Post was from: https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=14203