Re: It's running nicely now, sort of.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Three steps forward, two back is the rule. Or is it the other way around?
Posted on: 2013/9/16 1:00
|
|||
When two men ride the same horse, one has to be in the back...
|
||||
|
Re: It's running nicely now, sort of.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I like to take the "whole patient" approach to these things, I'd pull the tank, have it treated with the Re-Nu process, which will get it cleaned out and sealed, then check your fuel line going to the engine, make sure there is no rust (pinhole rust will drive you insane if it is happening) and replace the flex line to the fuel pump, that's probably pretty old now. One of the PAC regions has made new ones, I think Niagara Packards. How's the fuel pump? sometimes a car that has sat for a long time gets a lot of what is called gasoline today moving through it and the diaphragm has a disagreement with the chemical cocktail and that leads to fun. I'd go through all of that, make sure you are 100% and there will be less chance of road failure, and less devaluing of the car to the females in your life.
Posted on: 2013/9/16 10:01
|
|||
|
Re: It's running nicely now, sort of.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Clean tank and dead sender.
Gas was drained and tank removed Sunday. Examination of the bottom revealed a fine grainy substance resembling beach sand. The pickup tube enters the tank at the lower left. It turns up then turns back down and stops very close to the bottom in well stamped into the tank. I suspect that right turns piled enough sand against the wall to block the tube while left turns moved it to the center of the tank. A trip to the car wash, 5 minutes of high pressure soap and high pressure rinse followed by towels stuffed through the sending unit hole left the inside sparkling clean. An examination of said sender found, along with the sunk float, an open element and ground strap. Auto Zone has a "universal" GM replacement for $20.00 that I'll try. There are no filters in the line; I wonder what fine grainy stuff that looks like beach sand does to fuel pumps and carburetors? I guess I'll have to look. That project has to wait for the 62 Mercedes brakes. I shall report the success or failure of the Universal sending unit when I try it, Tom
Posted on: 2013/9/25 0:13
|
|||
|
Re: It's running nicely now, sort of.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Please save your money. Can guarantee that will not work. GM resistance rating runs opposite to Packard. Check the X-ref for multiple alternatives.
Posted on: 2013/9/25 6:58
|
|||
|
Re: It's running nicely now, sort of.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
As Ross said, it won't work. If going for universal, you need to find one with Chrysler or Ford values. Some of those year cars and 51-56 Packard need around 80 ohms empty and 10 full. GM type senders typically run opposite at 0 empty and 90 full. Some of the 57 Ford product senders bolt right in. Several prior threads give some places to get the drop in Ford items.
Posted on: 2013/9/25 9:11
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: It's running nicely now, sort of.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
If you're interested, I purchased a new sending unit on E-bay for $28, 4 mos. back It was listed as 57-60 Lincoln & it works fine. You might want to just check the float position & bend if needed. It was item #400439581433 at the time.
Posted on: 2013/9/25 18:30
|
|||
|