Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
202 user(s) are online (90 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 201

Pgh Ultramatic, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 2 (3)

Re: 1924 Single Eight 143 Oil Change Questions
#21
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Packtriots
See User information
Quote:

Karl wrote:
I had no choice to install this design instead of the oil drain plug. It's the optimal, lowest point for a dipstick. Furthermore, the components used were ideal without any rework. Regarding the "petrol tap opening"... my now notoriously poor English forces me to translate everything with the Google Translator... and there, "petrol tap opening" is translated as "petrol tap opening"... which in my language means "fuel tap." So, I don't know what "petrol tap opening" means. I only know petcocks as the eight brass taps on my engine's cylinder head.

Soldering the components with silver solder serves my goal of ensuring a "bullet-proof" connection between all parts and avoiding visually large transitions during the nickel plating process after this part is finished on my lathe.

It is certainly sufficient to use the well-known, good, oil-resistant thread sealants. And the nickel plating is simply a matter of aesthetics for me. By the way: After attaching the lower cover plates between the engine and the frame, only a piece of the standpipe and the cap are visible.

Karl


All makes sense. When I said "petcock", as pgh Ultramatic said, I'm referring to the old setup where that peacock was used to check if there is any oil at that low point in the engine. You removed yours and just plugged it. I will plan to do the same, I just need to double check that I can run my contraption up through the existing hole in the body. Your model does not have the sheet metal that runs the length of the engine bay at the bottom there as mine does. I could put a hole in it, but I'd prefer not to. Thanks again! If I get to doing this, I'll come back and post a photo of my much less visually appealing creation!

Posted on: Today 9:13
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 2 (3)




- Logged-in users will not see the following Adverts. Please Join (it's free) and Donate to help support the website -


- This above Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
Search
Photo of the Day
DSCN0613.JPG
Recent Photos
1946-47 Packard in ... (04/23/2025)
1946-47 Packard in ...
Torsion Level WITHO... (03/30/2025)
Torsion Level WITHO...
56 Trunk Lining Set... (03/15/2025)
56 Trunk Lining Set...
Brantford Coach Ad (01/25/2025)
Brantford Coach Ad
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2025, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved