Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The BTV has not been repaired recently that I know of. I did just have the brake light switch replaced. There was an issue where the MC was almost out of brake fluid when the switch was replaced.
I guess that I've got some work to do this winter, re brakes. I'll keep working on finding the best solution for me. Bob
Posted on: 2010/9/19 8:43
|
|||
Bob
IF EVERYTHING IS COMING YOUR WAY ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - YOU'RE IN THE WRONG LANE! '56 Executive Touring Sedan |
||||
|
Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
"There was an issue where the MC was almost out of brake fluid when the switch was replaced"
If there is no sign of leakage on the floor where the car sets or on the frame then most likely the fluid was sucked out of the master cylinder and into the power unit of the BTV. When u remove the BTV pour out any fluid in the power unit for an approximate measurement and report back please. The disk brake conversion is probably not needed in you case. Even with a disk brake conversion u will still need to convert the BTV to something else. Why not do it one step ata time. Either have the BTV rebuilt by a COMPETENT BTV REBUILDER or convert to a modern master and power unit. It's your choice. MY RECOMENDATION is the same as Craigs. Convert to a MODERN unit. Tha'ts what i did. At this point i do NOT recommend ANY BTV whether newly rebuilt or otherwise. The BTV has become much too controversial. Arguments (pro and con) over the BTV have raged for pages and pages over the last 10-12 years.
Posted on: 2010/9/19 10:08
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I agree with you about the BTV being something that I want to get away from. I am going to take this a step at a time and do it right.
I have a question about the brake pedal travel ratio, my 56 Executive, and the MC/booster mentioned in the Packard Panther rebuild site. If I install the same MC/booster (drilling the new holes for the booster unit) will I need to modify the brake pedal mount to achieve the desired higher pedal ratio? Bob
Posted on: 2010/9/19 11:11
|
|||
Bob
IF EVERYTHING IS COMING YOUR WAY ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - YOU'RE IN THE WRONG LANE! '56 Executive Touring Sedan |
||||
|
Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Yes. As Craig found, the 1:1 in the Packard requires extreme effort in a master designed for 3 or 4:1. The BTV is not a master cylinder in the conventional sense. It uses a long stroke with a narrow rod that never touches the cylinder walls to displace or squeeze the fluid out whereas the modern units use a short stroke and larger surface area to push the equivalent volume ahead of the piston.
Posted on: 2010/9/19 11:26
|
|||
|
Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
To achieve the desired longer pedal stroke, could I add spacers to the brake pedal mounts?
Posted on: 2010/9/19 11:45
|
|||
Bob
IF EVERYTHING IS COMING YOUR WAY ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - YOU'RE IN THE WRONG LANE! '56 Executive Touring Sedan |
||||
|
Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
The cylinder itself is the limiting factor. It can only move so far and you still have the force issue. At 1:1 you only get as much pressure as you can push with your foot whereas at the greater ratio you get your foot force plus the lever advantage but in a shorter distance. That limited distance is why the larger surface area is needed for the same volume. It becomes a trade off with the lever advantage getting the nod.
Posted on: 2010/9/19 11:55
|
|||
|
Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The booster/MC manufacturers specify (not recommend) 3 or 4 to 1 pedal leverage for a reason. I tried to use 1:1 with the MP booster and my Pat would not even slow down no matter how hard I pressed!
The releveraged pedal shown on my website works beautifully. Some have complained beforehand about the different pedal position, but not so much after they have driven it. Your muscle memory learns the new position pretty quickly whether or not you left or right foot brake. If you want an original pedal position and 3-4:1 ratio, you must go to a firewall mount booster/MC like PackardV8 (Honda), Turbopacman (Ford) or YesterdaysRadio. Craig
Posted on: 2010/9/19 12:29
|
|||
Nuke them from orbit, it's the only way to be sure! Ellen Ripley "Aliens"
Time flies like an arrow. Frui |
||||
|
Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Craig,
Do you have the dimensions of the brake pedal brackets and the measurements for the new holes to be made in the pedal arm? I think that yours is probably the best solution. It seems to be one with the least amount of metal work. It also leaves the changes as unobtrusive as possible. I could leave the two brake pedal mounts unattached to the firewall. This would mean that only two holes be made to the brake pedal arm. One thing though, in the final pictured brake pedal assy, what is attached to the top 'rod' via a clamp?
Posted on: 2010/9/19 13:20
|
|||
Bob
IF EVERYTHING IS COMING YOUR WAY ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - YOU'RE IN THE WRONG LANE! '56 Executive Touring Sedan |
||||
|
Re: Disc Brake Conversion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Start at post #3 and see pics that follow in the thread below. This about the eziest, cheapest fasterst and cleanest way to convert:
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb ... orum=3&post_id=29815#forumpost29815
Posted on: 2010/9/19 13:31
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|