Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
I get your point,but to me a Chevy engine in a Packard means it's no longer a Packard, just a another mongrel. Yup, absolutely. I don't have a problem putting different years of Packard engines in different years of cars, but at least use a Packard engine in it. Even if it's a 320/352/374 in a '37 115 it's still ok in my book. The only time a non-Packard engine should be used is if you're using a BTV and need something attached to a chain to throw out the door to stop.
Posted on: 2010/1/1 13:17
|
|||
|
Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I wonder if anyone has put a Packard 12 in a Clipper or even if it would be possible? Now that would get some attention!
Posted on: 2010/1/1 13:50
|
|||
______________________________________________
Dave |
||||
|
Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I don't see why not, it's shorter than the straight eight and should fit in there with a little work. Especially on a Senior chassis which is longer.
Posted on: 2010/1/1 13:55
|
|||
|
Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Now to find one for $500 hehehhe!
Posted on: 2010/1/1 14:00
|
|||
______________________________________________
Dave |
||||
|
Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The bad thing is a Packard V12 engine and trans is usually worth more than a postwar car that you'd be putting it in. I always thought it would be neat to put a Packard V12 in a '56 Patrician, and have the fabled postwar V12 Packard...
Posted on: 2010/1/1 15:01
|
|||
|
Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Many "surplus" Twelve motors have been used to create bogus upgrades of prewar Eights and Super Eights into Twelves. Beware of Twelves w/o original vehicle number plates.
Then there is the rumored 1954 Patrician with an alleged factory Twelve installation in the Chicago area, supposedly ordered by a livery service. Many leads to it over the years have proven illusive and as far as I know it's just a rumor. And if you look at the height of a Twelve motor, it's far too high to fit, the carb would be well above the hood even with the oil pan nearly scraping the pavement.
Posted on: 2010/1/1 15:38
|
|||
|
Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
That's not a problem Dave, custom oil pan and custom intake, no biggie.
Posted on: 2010/1/1 15:49
|
|||
|
Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Eric, how familiar are you with the Twelve? I'll send you a scan of factory blue prints tomorrow of the upper and lower ends, look at that before you say "no biggie".
We've already taken this thread for a ride far afield, why don't you start a new one about fitting a Twelve in a post-1950 chassis?
Posted on: 2010/1/1 16:23
|
|||
|
Re: Considering Packard v. Hudson
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I say no biggie because I've learned that some people can't think outside the box and I realize that there is no box.
I've never seen a Packard V12 in person, but I know enough about mechanics to know that if someone says I can't do it, I always find a way to prove them wrong. I look forward to seeing the scans, as it will enable me to prove my point.
Posted on: 2010/1/1 16:55
|
|||
|