Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
131 user(s) are online (113 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 130

Packard Don, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2) 3 »

Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

LJJ
See User information
Would I be correct in assuming that the 120 diff centre is interchangable with the 110?

Posted on: 2012/7/2 15:54
1963 Morris Cooper 997
1969 Austin 1800
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#12
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

flackmaster
See User information
Need to know what year. Starting in 1940, many of the six cylinder cars had a smaller/different rear axle/diff. I said many, as with Packard there are exceptions...

Posted on: 2012/7/2 17:28
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home

LJJ
See User information
1938 / 1939

Posted on: 2012/7/3 2:06
1963 Morris Cooper 997
1969 Austin 1800
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#14
Home away from home
Home away from home

LJJ
See User information
Also,is there any noticeable difference in fuel consumption between the Six and 120?

Posted on: 2012/7/5 23:18
1963 Morris Cooper 997
1969 Austin 1800
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#15
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

flackmaster
See User information
38-39's had the same basic rear ends. Ratios are different between years and models and 75 years of service history. Best to check rear ratio before guessing, but of course the 6 cylinder cars are likely to be more efficient. Need to know ratios and if overdrive equipped...

Posted on: 2012/7/6 1:11
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#16
Home away from home
Home away from home

Peter Packard
See User information
G'day all, As far as I know from stripping them out, 38/39 Six were 4.54 and 38/39 Eight were 4.36. I fitted a 39 Eight 4.36 ratio to my 38 Six ( plus R6 o/d) with the 38 Six axles ( because I had already fitted new axle bearings to the Six axles). PT

Posted on: 2012/7/6 1:38
I like people, Packards and old motorbikes
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#17
Home away from home
Home away from home

LJJ
See User information
Thanks all, I'm slowly convincing myself to purchase a Six (and add taller rear end and OD).

It also helps that no 120 are one the market in Australia at the moment.

Posted on: 2012/7/6 18:23
1963 Morris Cooper 997
1969 Austin 1800
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#18
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

flackmaster
See User information
Also note that there is a significant difference between the 38 floor shift transmission, when overdrive was not an option, and OD is not a straightforward retrofit, and the 39 column shift, where the addition of an overdrive is quite straightforward. Suggest you consult with Peter Toet, PACA Technical Officer, or others within PACA who may know of cars available that may not be advertised. I seem to recall a 39 conv.coupe might be available...just depends on what you are looking for. There was a RHD 40-110 available stateside recently, otherwise you will be limited to Australia cars, or a LHD import.

Posted on: 2012/7/6 19:02
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#19
Home away from home
Home away from home

Peter Packard
See User information
Fuel consumption is almost entirely dependant on the right foot pressure. At a GPS 65 mph (110kph) I normally average around 16-18 MPG per Imperial gallon (160 fluid ounces compared to 128 fluid ounces for a US Gallon). The Six and Eight are very similar in mass and Drag Co-efficient ( 1.9-2.1 compared to a modern car of around 0.4) There should be very little difference in fuel consumption. There is a 41- 120 with OD on OZ ebay at the moment. It is $A30k asking price with a spare car. I am not sure how negotiable the price is. There was also very recently a 39 Six with OD on the NSW South Coast for $A18k. They are around. PT

Posted on: 2012/7/6 20:34
I like people, Packards and old motorbikes
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Driving comparisons between the Packard Six and 120.
#20
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Ozstatman
See User information
Quote:
Peter Packard wrote:...There is a 41- 120 with OD on OZ ebay at the moment. It is $A30k asking price with a spare car. I am not sure how negotiable the price is...

Peter,

This one which is now at $A27K or offer.

Posted on: 2012/7/6 21:54
Mal
/o[]o\
====

Bowral, Southern Highlands of NSW, Australia
"Out of chaos comes order" - Nietzsche.

1938 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

1941 One-Twenty Club Coupe - SOLD

1948 Super Eight Limo, chassis RHD - SOLD

1950 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

What's this?
Put your Packard in the Packard Vehicle Registry!
Here's how!
Any questions - PM or email me at ozstatman@gmail.com
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2) 3 »





- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved