Re: 49 wings came loose
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Actually, the ornament is properly referred to as a Cormorant, which is the exact bird it is modeled after. The coat of arms is just exactly that, may sometimes be referred to as the emblem. The noun "Swan" should never enter the conversation of educated Packard folks.
Posted on: 2017/10/19 13:41
|
|||
|
Re: 49 wings came loose
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
MrPushbutton, I consider myself an educated Packard folk. The bird depicted in the ornaments is far too attractive to be a Cormorant, which is not a pretty bird. I understand there has been much discussion, opinions expressed, and words written on this subject. I will stick to my opinion, and expect others to have theirs, albeit different. Take care. JWL
Posted on: 2017/10/19 15:01
|
|||
We move toward
And make happen What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer) |
||||
|
Re: 49 wings came loose
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The bird at the top of the Packard coat of arms is a pelican. "A Pelican in her piety"... very old Christian symbolism used in heraldry, look it up. The bird hood ornament has been referred to as a Pelican, Cormorant and yes, even a Swan in official Packard Motor Car Company documents. Mine are Cormorants. Why does this argument persist?
Posted on: 2017/10/19 21:18
|
|||
|
Re: 49 wings came loose
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I took an admiring and closer look at my swept-back winged 1950 hood ornament and think it looks more swan-like than the rather ugly Cormorant. I don't know what kind of bird is seen on the heraldic Packard crest, but it certainly is not a swan feeding her offspring. So, I am content to have both a swan up top with some sort of feeding bird on the Packard emblem. In any case, the ambiguity of it all pales in contrast to GM producing a car, sold in Spanish-speaking countries as a "No Go" (or Nova). Let alone the French Canadian meaning for Lacrosse.
Since my wife pointed out that the upright winged Swan looked like a water fowl skidding to a panic stop, my admiration for a lethal hood decoration has cooled. I still like any of the birds a bit better than the Donut Pusher, but wonder what would have happened if the donut had Goodyear or Firestone emblems cast on it? After all, if the cormorant debate had never come up, how many people would have bothered to see what the term really meant? We're all richer for the debate and the magazine stands proudly named for the value it has to Packard lovers worldwide. It would still be as elegant if it were named Swan or Pelican.
Posted on: 2017/10/20 8:31
|
|||
|