Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
53 user(s) are online (46 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 4
Guests: 49

BDeB, Kevin, bkazmer, DavidM, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#1
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Goingbush
See User information
Anyone done a seal conversion, I mean a double lip TC oil seal that runs on the pulley stub, Theres just enough room for a 12mm seal . Of the 5 engines iv'e stripped the most crud to chip away is around the original spring loaded 'cork' seal rubbing on the timing chain cover. (I guess its better than the rear main seal - there isn't one.)

The way I see it modifying the front cover to accept a press in seal would be fairly straightforward. Anyone done it, I dont want to re-invent the wheel.

(Photo is as stripped, yes it needs a new chain)




Click to see original Image in a new window

Posted on: 11/5 6:18
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home

Pgh Ultramatic
See User information
I haven't, but I have an NOS one if you'd like it. Do you have the crankshaft and bore diameters?

Posted on: 11/5 7:37
1955 400 | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Deluxe | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Super Panama | Registry
Email (Parts/service inquiries only, please. Post all questions on the forum.)
service@ultramatic.info
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home

BDeB
See User information
The original typ is a simple mechanical seal that works very well.
Care needs to be taken when installing the timing cover to make sur that the opening for the crank pulley is entered.

Posted on: 11/5 10:17
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#4
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
Property installed that factory front seal is about as close to perfection as you can expect for a mechanical contrivance. It just makes absolutely no sense to consider a conversion.

Posted on: 11/5 17:33
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home

Packard Don
See User information
These were actually good seals that did their job well in properly maintained engines. Of course, for engines that have sat for decades, overheated or improperly maintained, they are likely hardened to the point that they are useless. That said, one of the reasons that this type of seal was used was because the shaft was keyed so you can never use a conventional seal with that!

Posted on: 11/5 21:16
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#6
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Goingbush
See User information
Quote:

Packard Don wrote:
These were actually good seals that did their job well in properly maintained engines. Of course, for engines that have sat for decades, overheated or improperly maintained, they are likely hardened to the point that they are useless. That said, one of the reasons that this type of seal was used was because the shaft was keyed so you can never use a conventional seal with that!


You never use a seal on the crankshaft itself, they are all keyed in every type of engine, the seal runs on the pulley.

Posted on: 11/6 0:09
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home

BDeB
See User information
Quote:

Goingbush wrote:
Quote:

Packard Don wrote:
These were actually good seals that did their job well in properly maintained engines. Of course, for engines that have sat for decades, overheated or improperly maintained, they are likely hardened to the point that they are useless. That said, one of the reasons that this type of seal was used was because the shaft was keyed so you can never use a conventional seal with that!


You never use a seal on the crankshaft itself, they are all keyed in every type of engine, the seal runs on the pulley.


Wrong, the seal does not run on the pulley, it seals against the timing gear cover.Again, to repeat, it is a simple mechanical seal that is functionally the same as very sophisticated mechanical seals used on high pressure centrifugal pumps.

Posted on: 11/6 0:14
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#8
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Goingbush
See User information
Quote:

BDeB wrote:
Quote:

Goingbush wrote:
Quote:

Packard Don wrote:
These were actually good seals that did their job well in properly maintained engines. Of course, for engines that have sat for decades, overheated or improperly maintained, they are likely hardened to the point that they are useless. That said, one of the reasons that this type of seal was used was because the shaft was keyed so you can never use a conventional seal with that!


You never use a seal on the crankshaft itself, they are all keyed in every type of engine, the seal runs on the pulley.


Wrong, the seal does not run on the pulley, it seals against the timing gear cover.Again, to repeat, it is a simple mechanical seal that is functionally the same as very sophisticated mechanical seals used on high pressure centrifugal pumps.


I and I believe Packard Don are both talking about a conventional seal here. they run on the pulley

Posted on: 11/6 0:20
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#9
Home away from home
Home away from home

BDeB
See User information
Quote:

Goingbush wrote:
Quote:

BDeB wrote:
Quote:

Goingbush wrote:
Quote:

Packard Don wrote:
These were actually good seals that did their job well in properly maintained engines. Of course, for engines that have sat for decades, overheated or improperly maintained, they are likely hardened to the point that they are useless. That said, one of the reasons that this type of seal was used was because the shaft was keyed so you can never use a conventional seal with that!


You never use a seal on the crankshaft itself, they are all keyed in every type of engine, the seal runs on the pulley.


Wrong, the seal does not run on the pulley, it seals against the timing gear cover.Again, to repeat, it is a simple mechanical seal that is functionally the same as very sophisticated mechanical seals used on high pressure centrifugal pumps.


I and I believe Packard Don are both talking about a conventional seal here. they run on the pulley


Once again .wrong . The crank pulley is keyed to the nose of the crankshaft and extends inside the timing cover to butt up against the crank timing gear and retain the metal housing for the seal . The original type seal does not touch the crank pulley surface but rides against the inside of the timing gear cover with a thin film of oil between the circular seal face and the timing cover.
As stated by others, the original type seal works very well.

Posted on: 11/6 1:01
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Crank pulley seal conversion ??
#10
Home away from home
Home away from home

Packard Don
See User information
That was my point. Putting in a conventional seal with the shaft running through it, the key slot wouldn’t seal but the factory seal works very well.

Posted on: 11/6 2:13
 Top  Print   
 









- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved