Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
112 user(s) are online (86 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 112

more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2)

Re: Straight 6 better than V8 in early 50's
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

phsnkw
See User information
Weren't Hudson's engine blocks made out of a chromium alloy? That would make them very durable against competitors as well as take to modifications easier. I don't recall reading much metallurgical stories on Packard's, so I don't know about the effect of upgrades.

Posted on: 2009/10/5 7:22
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Straight 6 better than V8 in early 50's
#12
Home away from home
Home away from home

Eric Boyle
See User information
I think but I'm not sure, that the Packard blocks were also a high-chrome casting. Not near as high as Hudson but still a lot more than your normal Ferd and Chebbie engines. Incidentally, the 426 Hemi blocks were known to "glow in the dark" since they had such a high nickel content. This is also the reason why the Japanese cast iron blocks last so long, as the cylinder walls are so hard they wear a lot less.

Perhaps others can chime in here, but I've never seen a Packard block with very much cylinder wear. Most of the time, you can see a slight ridge, but it doesn't catch your fingernail. This is true in almost all the Packard blocks I've torn into, V8's included.

Posted on: 2009/10/5 7:35
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2)




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved