Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
105 user(s) are online (69 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 104

37Blanche, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal

Forum Index


Board index » All Posts




Re: Henry Ford & Packard (trivia)...
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
Just to add to LINC400 comments, Packard and the Ford Motor Company had a fairly congenial relationship with each other. Ford's letter of congratulations on the event of Packard's 50th Anniversary is an example of that.

Posted on: 2010/3/3 14:46
 Top 


Re: Henry Ford & Packard (trivia)...
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

LINC400
No, Lincoln was not in the hearse business. And neither Packard or Cadillac built hearses. Packard and Cadillac produced a commercial chassis that could be purchased for conversion to hearses, flower cars, ambulances, etc. Lincoln did not.

Many companies used the Cadillac chassis, Superior, Sayers & Scoville, Miller Meteor, Eureka, etc. In 1938 or so, Henney and Packard signed an agreement making each other exclusive. Henney would only use the Packard chassis, and Packard would only sell to Henney. This, plus the increase in Cadillacs popularity, resulted in there being far more Cadillac hearses than Packards. On rare occasions, someone could take a regular passenger car from another manufacturer and have it converted to a hearse. But this was much more expensive and less practical

It was not ironic, but on purpose, than Henry Ford was carried in a Packard hearse. Henry Ford was driven out of the original Henry Ford Company. After he was gone, the company was renamed Cadillac. Plus Cadillac was competition to the Lincoln division. So there was no way Henry was going to ride in a Cadillac hearse. The family looked for, but could not locate a Lincoln hearse. With good reason, with no chassis or manufacturer using Lincolns, hardly any were built. So a Packard was chosen instead. It was still competition for Lincoln, but Henry was never kicked out of Packard, and did not have an intense hatred of the company like he did for Cadillac.

Posted on: 2010/3/3 14:44
 Top 


Re: Henry Ford & Packard (trivia)...
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
The story I've read goes to say that the family looked for a Lincoln hearse but were unable to locate a funeral house in the area that had one. But of course there were Lincoln hearses, like Packards they were bodied by coach builders that specialized in that area though the Henney relationship with Packard was pretty much of an exclusive thing by that time.

If you go to the Professional Car Society web pages you might find some pictures of such Lincolns, I haven't checked but wouldn't be suprised if you found some.

You might also consider rattling around www.coachbuilt.com for information about Lincoln professional cars. There is a special dedicated section just of the coachbuilders for professional vehicles.

Posted on: 2010/3/3 14:37
 Top 


Re: New Packard Concept Introduced in Geneva
Home away from home
Home away from home

Dan
Packard's been out of business for many years, so it's a given that any new Packard will be that in name only.

Why do all these designs using the name try to evoke Packards from the past, then?

Why not do a 21st century Packard that uses some design elements (e.g. grill with "shoulders", red hexagons), but reflects what a Packard might have been had it survived until the present day as a company?

Again, all this is my humble opinion....

Posted on: 2010/3/3 14:10
 Top 


Henry Ford & Packard (trivia)...
Home away from home
Home away from home

Dan
I've always found it ironic that the first Henry Ford went to his final resting place (in 1947) in a 1942 Packard hearse...

So now I'm curious...was Lincoln even in the hearse BUSINESS that year?

Posted on: 2010/3/3 13:39
 Top 


Re: 53 standard trans-V8
Home away from home
Home away from home

JWL
The short answer is yes. You will need the 55 V-8 manual shift transmission bell housing, flywheel, and clutch assembly. The clutch disc may need to be from a 288. There are more informed experts here who can advise you further.

(o {I} o)

Posted on: 2010/3/3 11:07
We move toward
And make happen
What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer)
 Top 


Re: Packard Six Sedan 1926
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
You inquired about the plating, asking if you should do chrome instead of silver. The choice would be between chrome and nickel (not silver), with nickel being the correct choice if you want to remain authentic. Nickel has quite a different lustre than chrome and at least in my opinion these earlier cars look far better with nickel trim than with chrome. Cost is about the same to have it redone as nickel is the layer that underlays chromium in bright chrome plating.

Keep us posted on your progress, love the car.

Posted on: 2010/3/3 9:44
 Top 


Re: Packard Six Sedan 1926
Home away from home
Home away from home

JD in KC
The early Packards are not my area of expertise but have you looked through the photos of '26 models on this website? I think you'll find that not one of the factory photos of the period show a '26 with whitewalls. And yet, over half of the restored Packards shown do have whitewalls. I like whitewalls myself on most late forties and definitely early fifties but I think your car was probably delivered with blackwalls. Your call.

Posted on: 2010/3/3 9:36
 Top 


Re: Frame crossover
Home away from home
Home away from home

packard1949
For what it is worth. I would suggest keeping a 47 Super Clipper orginal as possible. Some of these are the only post war cars recongized by the Classic Car Club(they recently added a Chrysler Town and Country). I think the models are 2103 and 2106.

Posted on: 2010/3/3 9:35
 Top 


Re: NAPA part #'s for the 3 brake hoses on a '55 400
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
If it's of any help to you, my 1962 Wagner catalog lists the following for a 1955 senior:

FC8699 for rear
FC20251 for front

Posted on: 2010/3/3 9:07
 Top 






Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved