Re: pushbutton transmission
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
John, the u tube link shows no video available. Joel.
Posted on: 2007/4/11 18:23
|
|||
|
Re: pushbutton transmission
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Well, I did it--I finally joined the youtube generation and put my first video up. It's a pushbutton actuator I rebuilt for a customer last fall, in final test mode on my test board.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCTxkx93h8c
Posted on: 2007/4/11 15:59
|
|||
|
Re: Packard employees question
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
My region, Motor city Packards did that project.
Posted on: 2007/4/11 10:44
|
|||
|
Re: pushbutton transmission
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
MrPushbutton -
Damned fine job on making those contact fingers - you ought to put a set on eBay and see what they bring. I've soldered everything from plumbing (nothing but copper on the supply side for me) to delicate electronics and even soldered a penny to a gas tank to stop a leak. I'm still using a 27W pencil-tip iron that I got from Radio Shack 35 years ago, plus my dad's old Weller gun for heavier work. Heck, I even have a "soldering copper" that perches on top of a blowtorch (c. 1913), fueled by "white gas". About the only solder job I haven't worked with is autobody filler, but I got a glimpse of the "plastic state" in soldering that penny. So, no problem there for me. Having been back in the auto biz for the past several years, let me tell you that it's quite refreshing to see such attention to detail and reliability. I look forward to hearing more of your work!
Posted on: 2007/4/10 23:37
|
|||
|
Re: Packard employees question
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Owen_Dyneto -
With all due respect (and nothing personal at all), the reprints you've cited were accomplished decades ago. However, what did the clubs do with the proceeds from such projects? Except for a few additional volumes of the Service Counselor and reprints of some minor marketing brochures, I've seen nothing new in terms of printed matter from PAC. The only Service Letters I saw available from PAC were for prewar models - when a gaping hole has existed, for decades, in terms of Service Technical Bulletins for postwar cars. I don't believe for a NY minute that the club could not have pulled that material together and had it reprinted. Through my own private efforts, over the years, I assembled a complete set of photocopies of STBs AND Studebaker Service Bulletins on the V8 cars, but was lucky enough to also acquire a nearly complete set of original STBs and General Service Bulletins dating back to 1952, plus assorted parts bulletins - all from a single estate. Yet, I will probably put everything except the V8 stuff on eBay, next winter, to people who are still looking for original material. Meanwhile, how much inventory of Centennial souvenirs is PAC still sitting on? For a variety of reasons, I couldn't see supporting PAC with my dues any longer and let my membership lapse last year. IMHO, that club has fallen out of touch of what Packard owners need from a club. Never mind getting the scoop on a top-secret project to produce V12 Packards for 1965 (that never happened), "tea and scones" just don't cut it. Yet, in spite of all that has transpired, know that, over the years, I had purchased not only the '55-'56 material that PAC had reprinted, but manuals for earlier series, from which the V8 cars were derived. However, I'd never copy a reprint and upload it here. As best as I can tell, only original material has been scanned and donated here.
Posted on: 2007/4/10 23:18
|
|||
|
Re: Packard employees question
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Webmaster
|
Well you all know my opinion on having the information available for free. If I didn't feel that way, then well this site wouldn't be here.
I think this website provides a good source of information for people that are skinny in the wallet and would rather spend their money on fixing their Packard(s). That being said, I have bought bound reprints, even though I have had access to the electronic versions via this website. Sometimes having a printed, bound version in hand makes for a more enjoyable read than a on-screen, or loose-leaf printed version. The main purpose of this website was to provide a resource of original PMCC generated information that falls within the public domain. Because while I think it great that the National Clubs sell printed versions. That really doesn't help you if you don't have that piece of content in your hand when your Ultramatic starts to act up, and you can't get your car out of the driveway, which is blocking your wifes car in. Being able to quickly get online, print out a page or two, and take those out to the car and not worry about getting those pages all greasy is priceless. Where I think the Clubs need to focus is providing new content for Packard owners. Things like PI's (Packards International) Engine Room judging guide is a great example of that. Also Brian's 55-56 STB and SC index available on the V8 Club website is another great piece. Other entities (such as Faxon Auto Lit) have already started producing high-quality reprints of the Service Manuals, Parts Books, etc. The content that they sell does not provide any revenue for the National Clubs in anyway. So I do not think that this website is sucking the coffers dry at any of the National Packard Clubs. Too my its all about Status Quo. If you just maintain the Status Quo, then nothing changes, good or bad. While I don't think of this site in competition to the national clubs. I hope they see that people really want this information online and available, and open their libraries to the general public. Once they do that, then they can focus on producing new, interesting, original content that people would be happy to pay for. This is just my
Posted on: 2007/4/10 22:51
|
|||
-BigKev
1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog 1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog |
||||
|
Re: Packard employees question
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Owen Dyneto--Yes, and I bought most of those reprints from those clubs and was darn happy they had gone to the bother of reprinting them for such a limited audience. Time has marched on, this thing called the internet has enabled people across the globe who have Packards, or fallen into one through an inheritance the ability to find out about the car, its care and feeding and the social network (read "club") devoted to it, many whom are isolated from the greater old car world we all are in.
The picture reproduction quality of many of the reprints was limited by the technology of the day. With my $50 Hewlett-Studebaker scanner I can scan my original literature to a quality that never exsisted in those reprints. This is one case where the technology has improved things for the owner/restorer. I wish the PAC would oublish, either on paper or over the internet their particular version of "correct" for my car, and any other Packard model they judge. Follow the example of the Lincoln club, take the parts book exploded diagrams and put legends and arrows pointing to everything in the illustrations stating "body color", "Matte black" "silver cad plating" etc. I'd let go of $50 for that, if it remained contant and prevented me from having to re-paint parts after the restoration.
Posted on: 2007/4/10 22:24
|
|||
|
Re: Packard employees question
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Let me just add a though, and I'm already bracing myself for the criticism that I'm fairly certain will follow, hopefully it won't get too personal. Before the days of free information on the Internet, the national Packard clubs sought out good copies of owners, shop, service letters and parts manuals and laid out the money to have decent copies produced. I've got a shelf full of these that I've bought and use them regularly to help others. Now I'm sure the clubs have recouped their initial costs, but the point to consider is that by making the information available for free, we deprive these clubs of the funds for future projects which then either won't happen or will be priced to the point where we all bellyache about the prices.
Posted on: 2007/4/10 22:05
|
|||
|
Re: pushbutton transmission
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
BH--I make the contact fingers myself, I made a tool to bend that special shape, and the tinning that is visable in my picture #6 is vital to a good bond. I make the fingers, Sandy Chirco does as well, but I would not advise attempting installation unless you are a V-8 owner with crackerjack soldering abilities. The dependability of the whole system is dependant on the integrity of those eight joints, especially the outer two, the fingers that go to the relay coils. I tend to get a little single-minded about these things, but the (almost unservicable) location that the actuator goes in demands that everything be right, or you don't have a reliable car, and I am against that!
I'll post more pictures as I go on this job.
Posted on: 2007/4/10 20:41
|
|||
|