Re: Packard Bikes
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I'm not sure what is happening. Maybe it is computer monitors. Maybe it is a growing number of folks with vision issues. Maybe it is merely a case of old age. But I increasingly keep reading descriptions of what clearly looks to be ORANGE described as "RED"...! When did this start?
I see the pedal car here with the Bowman & Schwartz-looking spear is described as "RED"... huh? A while back someone insisted to me that a 1956 Caribbean had a "RED" stripe. But then I saw the car and realized the stripe was Naples Orange. Somebody in this poor car's history got so carried away that they re-upholstered the interior out of RED leather (gulp!). A ghastly sight to behold... AND... Not long ago I had someone insist to me that the Golden Gate bridge in San Francisco is "RED." Got hot under the collar about it too! But anyone who knows that bridge should be aware that the color is "International Orange." So are we experiencing mass hallucinations? Or what?
Posted on: 4/26 9:37
|
|||
|
Re: Packard Bikes
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
And now... back to Packard bicycles. From 1937 and a bicycle wholesale-distributor's (W-D) catalogue. Here is a Colson-built deluxe balloon model that was specially-badged PACKARD.
Colson was located for many years in Elyria, Ohio and was famous for making high-quality bicycles as well as industrial casters, hospital equipment, automotive components and more. Some folks who believe they are knowledgable about Colson will argue the year (the internet is a home for endless arguing). But the catalogue is the catalogue and when the W-D sold it is indisputable. So? It is what it is. Collectors today presume that all bicycles made by certain manufacturers have to look like and be equipped in lock-step with what the manufacturer's brand did. Not true. W-Ds did whatever they wanted. So it is useless to expect a W-D model like Packard made by Colson to look exactly like and be equipped exactly like the manufacturer's line of Colson. Colson-made is not Colson. Some will also look at the specs and note that the coaster brake is listed as "optional"... and jump to conclusions. But what this really meant was the brand of coaster brake was optional. The option was New Departure, Morrow or Musselman brands. The printing on this page was not the best but was indicating the standard color of maroon. Optional was blue as indicated. The hornlight shown looks like those supplied by Delta Electric (they also made electrical components for real Packard Motor Car Company Packards). But in reality, the hornlight supplied for these bicycles was made by E.A. Laboratories. Grips were what was known as Champion grips and today commonly referred to as "Coke-bottle" grips. So pervasive has this terminology become that some re-poppers have taken to making handlebar grips that look like scrunched-up Coca-Cola bottles! Image is courtesy of National Bicycle History Archive of America which has thousands of original bicycle catalogues and advertisements.
Posted on: 4/21 9:12
|
|||
|
Re: Packard Plant
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
And just to underscore what I've been telling you about the absurdity of all those "concerned neighbors" the TV news and Detroit newspapers trot out for the cameras anytime the Packard plant is discussed.
I just went to Detroit for a funeral. While there, I took a quick side trip to see my old friend, the Packard plant! Heartbreaking as it has been for many a year. But HERE is what has happened to the old Packard Motel where execs used to stay while visiting the plant... As I used to say in automotive product planning meetings... "What looks better? Real wood that looks fake? Or fake wood that looks real?????"
Posted on: 4/14 14:22
|
|||
|
Re: 1956 Caribbean Production
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Totally understood. And great for the Maucks and altruism and philanthrophy. Good for them. But nobody said you did or didn't say what you've just stated. Nobody. So let's not beat an egg into a horse. Only said that this stuff has indeed been preserved and individuals have indeed had the forethought to save it in the first place for people to argue about today. Before the internet. All of which is precisely why I started collecting and preserving the Packard stuff... and notes and memories decades ago. What I saved was not communal nor a group effort. It was my personal effort. Even if it is a bad thing today to get credit for what one has actually done on their own. Or that such individual efforts do not matter in the communal world of today– unless one is giving it all away to this or that, etc..etc. I'm not "dad"... and watching stuff get tossed is certainly not a new phenomenon to me. Please. I was there when they were tossing out Packard stuff in Detroit. I had relatives who worked for Packard. I owned commercial property near the Grand Blvd. plant. My family had a store near the ConnerAvenue plant– which I watched both open and close. I had friends who actually worked on real Packards, including special ones... like the Balboa, the Request, the Panthers, and the Predictor. I actually knew this stuff. Sharing the info? Over the years I have included inside stories, histories, photos and memories in The Packard Cormorant magazine, Hemmings Motor News, Special-Interest Autos magazine, Car Classics magazine, Popular Mechanics and more. Including a book I wrote. For the first time in history, I listed the actual Packard Pan Americans, their full history, how they got made, etc. etc. Showed photos no one had ever seen before. Facts no one ever wrote about before. Minimizing all this is fine, I guess. But my efforts and collections are not communal. And I should not be browbeat over what I decide or don't decide to do with my stuff. No matter what anyone may imagine in my ability to envision, certainly there has been prior thought to preserving the history of this stuff. Including ... when I go to the great Packard graveyard in the sky. So. And again with all due respect, I have just a little clue here about saving the history and sharing it. I detest arguments– especially online. Thanks for the concern and passion.
Posted on: 4/4 15:37
|
|||
|
Re: 1956 Caribbean Production
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Roscoe has his records and I have mine. With all due respect to Packard knowledge seekers of today, I've been at this for a lot of years. Yes, I know where Roscoe is located and I have been to his place several times. We visit fairly often on the phone and via emails. Please understand I've known Roscoe since the 1970s. I have been collecting this stuff since the 1950s, back when nobody cared. Saved everything I could from Conner Avenue (my aunt worked for the guy who set the plant up). Started out putting everything Caribbean on 3 x 5 cards. Did this on my own. And started my own roster for Caribbeans in the 1970s and this ran, advertised world-wide for many years– even if nobody remembers today. My Caribbean Roster was always in Hemmings Motor News Almanac for decades. Today? Nobody can seem to remember... or even know about it. But this was long, long, long before anyone knew about digitalizing. Or the almighty internet. This stuff has indeed been preserved– even if today's folks on the internet don't know about it. Love for all things Packard– including Caribbeans– has been going on a long, long time. Things happen as the years go by and generations get replaced.
Posted on: 4/4 14:15
|
|||
|
Re: 1956 Caribbean Production
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Your Caribbean MES hardtop was sold new out of the Philadelphia region. My buddy, the great Roscoe Stelford and myself have records on these cars. Yes, yours would have been in the last third of Caribbean hardtop production. You can always look for casting dates on your engine, transmission and other parts. As for dates on the rears of instrument cluster gauges... those were made fairly well in advance so don't depend on dates stamped as a gospel guide there. Also, remember that all 1956 Caribbeans (hardtops as well as convertibles) required extra steps in the assembly process at Conner Avenue. Therefore, none of these cars were a straight-through assembly like a Patrician or Four Hundred. Each was pulled from the normal line and shunted to a separate area where trim work was done for the tops. This slowed things down a bit more for all Caribbeans. Important thing to remember.
Posted on: 4/4 11:43
|
|||
|
Re: Auction: Royce G Kershaw Estate, Montgomery, AL, Weds. Feb. 21st, 2024
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Sorry to learn that Royce has passed. Years ago when I visited with Royce and Knox (the brothers) they had a 1956 Caribbean convertible and at least one other. At that time, they also owned a very unusual racing Duesenberg, "The Mormon Meteor" which has turned up at shows and in magazines of more recent years. I got to start it and sit in it. Their business manager (a fellow named Mahoney) also had a 1956 Caribbean convertible that I got to drive. I understand that it was sold years ago. Wondering what happened to all those other Caribbeans? Hmmmmmm.
Posted on: 3/31 17:32
|
|||
|
Re: Packard Bikes
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Great stuff... we also have numerous Toledo "Blue Streak Line" catalogues. Some are in magnificent color!
Posted on: 3/31 7:59
|
|||
|
Re: Assessment of 1955 Packard Caribbean via Artificial Intelligence.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
...And my personal Caribbean Roster has more. And I have actively been collecting data and info on these cars since at least the 1960s and rode in the very first 1956 Caribbean (a hand-built prototype driven by a Packard engineer) when new in 1955. Of course ridiculous nonsense is expected to come out of asking AI. BUT... don't blame absurd statements of Packard "facts" and "history" solely on AI or whether the person making the enquiry is young OR old. Or being unfamiliar with the scope and operation of AI. Posing any question to infant AI as it is today is a crapshoot at best. However... Try asking the be-all-know-all almighty "wikipedia" about Earle C. Anthony's Packard neon sign... or the one-off Packard Request, for examples. Last time I looked good 'ol wiki was blurting BS about how "several Packard Requests were left sitting on showroom floors, unsellable". Silly hallucination stuff worded as fact. And one can compare good 'ol wiki's oleo nonsense on Earle C. Anthony's Packard neon "history" to the factual story published in The Packard Cormorant magazine. Look it up. Few people do since few know the TPC story was ever published. Few are aware of the expertise in TPC magazine. And of course to go that far means one might actually have to do some real work and dig (OFF of the internet– the old way)... or (clutch the pearls!) actually buy the magazine! Heaven forbid! On wiki... ANYBODY can make up and say anything at all... and get it passed off as fact. And if one goes to the trouble of getting to be a "wiki editor" and goes in and makes factual corrections, some moron can simply get themself also installed as a "wiki editor" and then change the correction BACK to the BS!!!!! Ask me how I know on this. Whether AI or wik-I... the issue remains. From someone who ran computers back in the days of the great IBM "360" there was a saying we used back then that is still valid today with both wiki and AI: "Garbage in– garbage out."
Posted on: 3/27 15:26
|
|||
|