Re: 1931 engine / body numbers
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Thanks West and Owen_D. That was the kind of advice I was looking for.
West I have sent you a PM. Dongle
Posted on: 2010/8/24 19:42
|
|||
|
Re: 1931 engine / body numbers
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Sorry. I suspected when I posted that I would need to elaborate. I was trying to keep it simple...
The three numbers I immediately referred to are the engine number - embossed on its mount. A frame number embossed near the steering gear mount which I referred to as a body number - (I know its not though) and a third number embossed directly on the steering gear itself. On my 31, all are sequentially 'close' as it sits. I did a quick look, and these were the easy numbers this afternoon. This brings up another interesting sub question, does anyone have a list of all the locations of such embossed numbers? To provide a level of comfort about the originality of an engine, I suspect there would not be a large difference in these numbers. I know they certainly would not match. I guess my question is, does an engine number which is substantially different cause people in the Packard world grief? For example, what if the engine number was some 7000 less than the frame number and 6500 less than the steering gear number - and yet fall within the range for 1931 engine numbers? In my mind such an engine would be, say 6 months older. The reason is I am looking at an engine replacement, and the donor engine is some 7000 'older' than my original engine. Yes it falls within the proper 1931 engine number range. Thanks Dongle
Posted on: 2010/8/22 18:49
|
|||
|
1931 engine / body numbers
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Hello all;
I know these things never match..... Is it the general consensus that engine / body (stamped on frame) / and other numbers should be relatively close to each other to provide proof of originality - to the car? Or has anyone seen engine numbers several thousand (say 7 lower) away and still been original to the car? Is that clear?? Thanks Dongle
Posted on: 2010/8/22 15:57
|
|||
|
Re: Float for a 1929 packard carb. needed.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Posted on: 2010/4/25 15:11
|
|||
|
Re: Packard Literature
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Jim:
Thank you for submitting your literature. Your efforts are greatly apreciated!!! Anything on late 20's / early 30's Packards (sorry to hint!) is always welcomed with a big smile. Again thanks so much. dongle
Posted on: 2010/4/5 7:19
|
|||
|
Re: 30's Engine interchange
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
I'm going to re-ignite this topic. From previous posts, it appears that a 29-31 standard eight would fit, there were no conclusions about 'newer'. Any thoughts on later standard eights - 32, 33 etc. All help is appreciated. Dongle
Posted on: 2010/4/2 7:10
|
|||
|
Re: 1932 light eight
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Quote:
....NADA pricing athttp://www.nadaguides.com is more realistic..... End Quote I don't know they're kinda out there. I'd like to meet the guy that'd pay me these prices.... http://www.nadaguides.com/default.aspx?LI=1-22-1-5013-0-0-0&l=1&w=22&p=1&f=5014&y=1931&m=1317&d=4683&c=7&vi=80953&da=1
Posted on: 2010/3/14 16:59
|
|||
|
Trippe Speed Lights
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Does anyone have any part / model numbers available for speed lights over the years?
i.e. this Trippe model was the senior model for the following years....., this Trippe model was the junior model for the following years sizes would be a help too. There seems to be a number of different sizes and models produced. I have spent a few minutes looking, but can't find anything web based. Thanks Dongle
Posted on: 2010/2/15 11:26
|
|||
|
Re: Is replacing the wood on a '20's vintage body difficult?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Thanks for the tip. I had been aware of this book before. If you read the 'reviews' the book seems more geared toward work on the exterior of a woody.
Any other thoughts on books??? BTW Thomas I'm very glad to see the site up and running - looks good. Dongle
Posted on: 2009/12/7 21:06
|
|||
|