Re: 48-50 fuel sender idea
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Many are keen on these access holes but I don’t like cutting up a car like that even it makes such work easier. My philosophy (if you can call it that) is to fix it so that you never have to take out the sender again and if in the off-chance that you do, it’s very easy to pull the tank.
Posted on: 2022/3/9 21:13
|
|||
|
Re: 48-50 fuel sender idea
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I found this testing procedure last night.
I believe this is for a Ford, but if it would be the same for Packard's it might be nice for others to review. Can anyone review this and tell me if its compatable with any Packar years?. I assume Packard 51-56, but you know what they say about assuming.
Posted on: 2022/3/11 12:34
|
|||
|
Re: 48-50 fuel sender idea
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
About Assume, that’s why I typically say Presume. It’s safer!
Posted on: 2022/3/11 13:40
|
|||
|