Re: 56 Patrician
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
|
Thanks for all of the info guys, the springs were a bit weathered but otherwise ok, all of the teeth were just a bit rounded and the latch had a bit too much missing. I did however order a new assembly and it works perfectly. No more rolling in park at least till i get to look at the tranny.
Posted on: 2008/3/2 18:23
|
|||
|
Re: 56 Patrician
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I've had the same problem with my very low mileage (34K miles when i got it) 5672 parking brake. The pawl is worn. Using a file it is HARDENED. Probably .010-.015 cyanide. The pawl on mine is worn. I'm replacing the entire assembly with one from a parts car with over 100K miles. Haven't tried it yet but the replacement shows very little wear.
Posted on: 2008/3/2 22:55
|
|||
|
Re: 56 Patrician
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
|
Hah sounds like somebody sat there playing with the brake for too long. Hopefully the new one i bought will last a while.
Another thought though, now that i can stop it from rolling in park, and it runs-ish, by that i mean it doesn't run well in drive. It seems to stall if you leave it in drive for too long. I'm curious as to where i should go next in the project, Like i said earlier I'm still new to this and i don't want to be tearing this thing apart with no direction.
Posted on: 2008/3/15 15:45
|
|||
|
Re: 56 Patrician
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I discovered that the parking brake mechanism was manufacutered withOUT deburring. Nearly all of the edges have burrs on BOTH of my units. I deburred the high mileage unit and put it on. SMOOTH and RELIaBLE.
Posted on: 2008/3/15 21:16
|
|||
|