Re: Correct coil spring part number for 41 160
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Webmaster
|
Dan,
Not sure if it helps or not. But on pages 296-297 on the 35-41 Parts List, it lists the following same parts numbers and specs for all the models on the 1903-1906 Chassis (except the Darrin Victoria): P/N TYPE LOAD RATE COLOR 335692 (STD) 1750 77 Red & Silver 338166 (FWE) 1870 90 Yellow & Silver So based on that, I would imagine that 335692 would be correct P/N.
Posted on: 2008/11/7 0:42
|
|||
-BigKev
1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog 1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog |
||||
|
Re: Correct coil spring part number for 41 160
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
|
Kev:
Thanks for the quick response. I noted the info you cited on the top of page 297 (page 16 of the pdf scan for Group 14) pertaining to chassis #'s 1903-1906. However I wasn't sure which number to look at; the one that is followed by STD, which I assume means standard, or FWE, which I am not sure how to interpret. I understand that the springs are designed very specifically for the weight of the front end, which can be significantly more with the side mounts, and am not quite sure if this chart is specific enough to my vehicle, which is closest in design to a body number 1472 4dr 5 pass sedan which is not listed on this chart. There is also a reference to front springs on page 10 (page 12 of the pdf scan of the Intro) which lists several parts numbers for various loads, rate and free lengths, that pertain to several different chassis models, however this info is also not definitive to my vehicle. Perhaps if I had the owner's manual for the 1941 160, which I don't, it might list the coil spring loads for the various body styles on a 1903 chassis and I could then get the corresponding part number from that list? I want to make sure I give them the correct part number so that my front end won't end up sitting up too high or down too low.
Posted on: 2008/11/7 1:35
|
|||
Dan Marrin
Summers; Breezy Point, MN, Winters; The Villages, FL '48 Sup8 conv, '48 Sup8Del LWB sed, '58 Hawk. |
||||
|
Re: Correct coil spring part number for 41 160
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Webmaster
|
Dan,
With yours being a custom body, I am not sure that the Owner's manual would offer anything specific to the Rollson models. I always thought the complete chassis with drivetrain were delivered to the coach builders. So wouldnt that mean it left Packard with the springs in place? Unless Rollson specified a different spring, or changed them once they arrived at their facility, then I would think all the 1903 Chassis were the same based upon the information in the Parts List(except the Darrin as noted).
Posted on: 2008/11/7 1:57
|
|||
-BigKev
1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog 1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog |
||||
|
Re: Correct coil spring part number for 41 160
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
FWE = fender well equipped, i.e. 6 wheel with sidemounts so your Rollson should have the yellow/silver spring (higher capacity) for the extra weight.
EDIT: To be more precise, FWE meant fender well equipment, not fender well equipped. Small point but it deserves correction.
Posted on: 2008/11/7 9:06
|
|||
|
Re: Correct coil spring part number for 41 160
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
|
Owen:
Thanks for deciphering the FWE code for me, and all the help you have given me in researching the origin and history of my Rollson. I will assume, as Kevin did, that the 1903 chassis was delivered to Rollson with the coil springs in place and that they did not install anything different than what would have come with the chassis. I'll go with the yellow/silver part number 338166. Thanks again to both you and Kevin for chiming in.
Posted on: 2008/11/7 9:57
|
|||
Dan Marrin
Summers; Breezy Point, MN, Winters; The Villages, FL '48 Sup8 conv, '48 Sup8Del LWB sed, '58 Hawk. |
||||
|
Re: Correct coil spring part number for 41 160
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I think your assumption is correct that what was delivered to Rollston was a complete running chassis. But I'm not sure just a chassis, which was usually complete with sheet metal and trim to and including the front windshield was available as late as 1941. The 2 1941 Rollsons I've seen (the ex-Kevin Gaffney 160 swb panel and one other) were delivered as sedans and the majority of the body removed and discarded. But if the original VN tag is present, it will tell you as a naked chassis would be stamped 1903-XXXX where as if it shipped as a sedan for conversion it would start with the body style number.
EDIT: Perhaps I should have used an example of how the VN number will help explain whether a running chassis + nose was delivered, or a sedan subsequently cut off and modified. The car is a 1940 "180" with a one-off body by Derham. The patent plate VN starts "1807 (the chassis #) + the chassis sequence #, not the expected 1342-xxxx if it were delivered as a factory bodied car to be modified by Derham.
Posted on: 2008/11/7 11:02
|
|||
|