Re: 288 H head
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I believe it raises the compression from about 7:1 to about 7.5:1. As far as I know, tune up specs are not changed. HP, torque, and efficiency are improved by 3 to 5%.
Posted on: 12/29 10:42
|
|||
|
Re: 288 H head
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I believe TxGoat may be correct and the H designation was stamped for an easy way to identify the late to arrive 288 higher compression heads mentioned in the service article.
Seem to recall reading there was also a different head used in cars with Ultramatics that also raised the compression slightly for a bit more horsepower but don't remember by how much. Those might have been used more on the 327 and believe they had an AT designation stamped or cast. There is probably a service article on them somewhere.
Posted on: 12/29 11:15
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: 288 H head
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The 51-54 Specs manual lists 7.0 and 7.8 compression heads. Apologies if I'm off-base.
Posted on: 12/29 11:31
|
|||
1955 400 | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Deluxe | Registry | Project Blog 1955 Clipper Super Panama | Registry |
||||
|
Re: 288 H head
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Interesting. I wasn’t looking for any increase but I certainly won’t turn it down. Just trying to identify exactly what I have here and how it compares with my current 49 22nd deluxe 288.
Attached are some snaps of the new engine, sorry the engine number is very hard to read so I’m trying to get another picture or make it out better. Attach file: 2582FAC2-08E2-4E0D-A70B-807E694FBE2C.jpeg (325.89 KB) 86D2180B-42AF-4A29-B209-B508B4677D69.jpeg (269.72 KB) 4D1C216B-5788-4559-B87E-C4F812EB5CAC.jpeg (196.12 KB)
Posted on: 12/29 14:29
|
|||
|
Re: 288 H head
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I was wondering about this again, so was the higher compression head covered in the service article (seems to be the one I have) an option you could elect for/purchase through a dealer, or recommended to be swapped in during a service at some point in 1950?
Posted on: 1/12 17:57
|
|||
|