ultramatic to chrysler 727
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just popping in
|
i have a 53 clipper delux and im trying to find info on swapping out my ultramatic to a 727. can anyone help. thanks
bryan
Posted on: 2007/9/16 10:15
|
|||
|
Re: ultramatic to chrysler 727
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
There are several threads on the AAC Packard forum on the subject.
forums.aaca.org Doing a search for "Chrysler" after you're in the Packard forum brings up one but there are others. Can't give the exact words to search to bring them up. Some have had luck, other not so thrilled due to various reasons. Another alternative might be the GM transmission here: mikestransmissions.com/Classics/UltraOD.html and I believe there is a TH400 conversion also available from another vendor.
Posted on: 2007/9/16 10:51
|
|||
|
Re: ultramatic to chrysler 727
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Brian: What you have stated about swapping the ultramatic for 727 are great words of advice. More money is spent finding a half cocked solution to problems, than if the item in need of repair was fixed in the first place.
In my opinion the ultramtic has gotten a bad wrap over the years, because of misconceptions and lack of understanding about the transmission. I have driven and owned a good many a Chevy over the years, with the two speed powerglides, these tranies take forever to shift. No worse or better than the ultramatic. Now talk about transmissions that are real dogs and had alot of problems, how about the so called GREAT BUICK DYNAFLOWS. John F. Shireman
Posted on: 2007/9/19 20:16
|
|||
|
Re: ultramatic to chrysler 727
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I further believe that many Ultramatics have suffered more from incompetent post-dealer service than anything else.
These days, Ultramatic Dynamics offers plenty of new-and-improved parts and sage advice for the Ultramatics. John, I should also add that the Ultramatic service info (for all years and makes) that you so kindly donated to the site is an absolute must to review.
Posted on: 2007/9/19 20:35
|
|||
|
Re: ultramatic to chrysler 727
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Hi all, It took 5 removal/replaces on my 56 Patrician (yes with the PB auto) to sort out that the main problem was around 0.010 wear on the input shaft where the rear pump pressure goes in. The Packard Ultramatic is a very good box when it is working properly. The unfortunate thing is that most automatic gearbox repairers have no knowledge of converters which "lock-up" or of rear pumps shutting down front pumps.
The problem with any of the modern transmissions and a Packard transmission that does not change over to the rear pump and engage the converter contemporaneously (at the same time) is that the converter overheats and cooks the gearbox. The modern gearboxes get over it with very low stall and lightweight cars. With a Packard Ultra or twin-Ultra you had excellent engine braking and it runs very cool, even towing very heavy trailers. I have had a Torqueflite V8 trans ready to install since 1978, but I cannot convince myself that it is an improvement. I have tried to second guess Packard engineering on a few occasions without success so I guess that I am either truly brainwashed or a genuine Packard Nut. Peter Toet P.S. Get the Ultramatic box repaired/ overhauled
Posted on: 2007/9/20 3:27
|
|||
I like people, Packards and old motorbikes
|
||||
|
Re: ultramatic to chrysler 727
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
George Lupfer in Carlile, PA (Lupfer transmission, rte. 422 Carlisle, PA)does a fine job rebuilding Ultramatics. He trained on them (and Dynaflows,and powerglides,and Borg Warners.........) back in the day.
He owns a fine '56 400.
Posted on: 2007/9/20 8:12
|
|||
|