Re: 54 Gear start vs not
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Anybody? No answers or opinions?
Posted on: 2010/12/28 20:44
|
|||
56 Clipper Deluxe survivor
|
||||
|
Re: 54 Gear start vs not
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
You won't be able to use any Ultramatic with your six as the pilot in the back of the crank is not big enough to accept the nose of the torque converter. You are stuck with stick.
Posted on: 2010/12/28 20:58
|
|||
|
Re: 54 Gear start vs not
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Understood. No issue here with a 6/stick combo, was just contemplating a '54 w/ straight 8 in case it turns out to be impractical to do a 6cyl conversion in a 54/55, and was actually addressing the viability of the GS Ultramatic vs. earlier version.
Posted on: 2010/12/29 8:56
|
|||
56 Clipper Deluxe survivor
|
||||
|
Re: 54 Gear start vs not
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Traditional Ultramatics behind the in-line 8s had probably as good a reliability as any of the other early automatics. You don't HAVE TO take advantage of the gear-start complication, I suspect driving in the conventional Ultramatic mode will minimize susceptibility to the gear-start concerns. On my Twin Ultramatic, I very rarely use the optional "3-speed" mode.
Posted on: 2010/12/29 9:07
|
|||
|
Re: 54 Gear start vs not
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Very interesting point, I hadn't considered the possibility of using the GS in a way thats avoid any incipient issues, thanks.
Posted on: 2010/12/29 10:11
|
|||
56 Clipper Deluxe survivor
|
||||
|