Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
52 user(s) are online (47 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 51

Ozstatman, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




46 vs 48 vs 50 engines...
#1
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Johnny
See User information
I was planning on putting my '50 engine into my '48. I recently came across a '46 engine that I might want to place into my '48 instead.

Question - Will the '46 fit? Are there any drawbacks? What are the major differences between the '46 & '48?

Thank you very much.

Posted on: 2011/4/10 15:36
Thank you! Johnny
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 46 vs 48 vs 50 engines...
#2
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
Which engine are you referring to? The 6-cylinder 245 cid and large 8-cylinder 356 cid engines are essentially the same between 1946 and 1950. The single mid-sized 8 282 cid in 1946-47 was replaced by a pair of engines in 1948; the "288" and the "327" which have larger bores than the former 282, larger bore center-to-center dimensions, and thus the blocks are a bit longer. Other less important differences.

Best to let us know which of the 4 engines you're interested in knowning more about.

Posted on: 2011/4/10 15:50
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 46 vs 48 vs 50 engines...
#3
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Johnny
See User information
Sorry about that. I am talking about a '46 8 cyl that I am thinking of using in my '48. I pulled a 288 out of mine and have already sold it.

How easy or difficult is it to place a '46 8 cyl into my '48? Will it fit OK, or will I need to do some modifications?

Thanks!!!

Posted on: 2011/4/10 19:29
Thank you! Johnny
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 46 vs 48 vs 50 engines...
#4
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Johnny
See User information
One more thing. Will a '50 Ultramatic Trans bolt up to a '46 8 cyl?

Posted on: 2011/4/10 19:31
Thank you! Johnny
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 46 vs 48 vs 50 engines...
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home

Ross
See User information
A 46 282 is a couple of inches shorter than the later 288s and 327s, so it will go in the hole, but you would have to fuss with the mounts.

The problem will come when you go to install your Ultramatic to it. The bellhousing may very well bolt on, but the nose of the convertor will not pilot into the crank by a long shot. You would have to machine the hole much larger, and I also don't know if the flex plate would bolt up. Too much trouble!

Posted on: 2011/4/10 19:52
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 46 vs 48 vs 50 engines...
#6
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Johnny
See User information
Thank you for this great information. You saved me a lot of heartache.

Posted on: 2011/4/11 23:43
Thank you! Johnny
 Top  Print   
 









- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved