Happy Thanksgiving and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
403 user(s) are online (326 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 3
Guests: 400

Packard Don, CCR, dick29, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




flex plate interchange
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

John Wallis
See User information
I find I am in need of a new flexplate for the marine V8 (missing ring gear tooth and attendant damage). Are all of the Ultramatic flexplates interchangeable from 1950-1956?

Thanks

Posted on: 2012/3/1 14:04
 Top  Print   
 


Re: flex plate interchange
#2
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
Guess I'm a little surprised to hear that the marine conversion uses a flexplate and not a conventional flywheel. You'd think without the weight of the torque converter, a flywheel's weight would be needed to obtain decent idle and low-speed operation. Are you sure you mean a flexplate?

Posted on: 2012/3/1 14:14
 Top  Print   
 


Re: flex plate interchange
#3
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
3 part numbers listed--23rd to 54 reg Ultra, 54 GS, and 55-6. Not the greatest pictures in manuals but it appears the circumference for torque converter attachment bolts may be one of the the differences. Can't tell if any different on overall size anywhere else or in crank bolts.

The 55-6 also have a sort of pad arrangement for locating the converter bolts the earlier ones do not have. Since those later converters have basically the same exterior, may be part of why there is a separate one for the 54 GS. If that were the only difference though, would have thought the 54GS and 55-6 would be the same.

Posted on: 2012/3/1 14:46
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: flex plate interchange
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

John Wallis
See User information
Quote:

Owen_Dyneto wrote:
Guess I'm a little surprised to hear that the marine conversion uses a flexplate and not a conventional flywheel. You'd think without the weight of the torque converter, a flywheel's weight would be needed to obtain decent idle and low-speed operation. Are you sure you mean a flexplate?


Thanks HH & O_D

It is indeed a flexplate, I assume that the mass of the large drum & planetary set in the reverse gear may provide enough mass in lieu of a flywheel. The only function seems to be to provide starter engagement, so any of those that HH mentioned should work as long as the crankshaft bolt pattern and the diameter and number of teeth on the ring gear are the same.

Attach file:



jpg  (80.91 KB)
123_4f4fdd0a5f57f.jpg 1280X960 px

Posted on: 2012/3/1 15:33
 Top  Print   
 









- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
32nd Annual Florida Packard Club Meet
01/26/2025
46th Annual Texas Packard Meet
04/03/2025 - 04/06/2025
Packard Salon - Calling All Twelves
05/27/2025 - 05/29/2025
58th Annual National Meet
05/31/2025 - 06/06/2025
AACA Fall Meet (Hershey)
10/06/2025 - 10/10/2025
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved